AI Rate Professor

Chemistry

Andrey G. Balakin

CHEM151 · CHEM152 · CHEM · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
17/100
RMP rating
1.7/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
4.3

The decision

if you can self-study difficult chemistry and .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerConfusing ExplanationsVery Hard ChemistryHeavy ReadingOld School TeachingAvoid If Possible
  • Students describe the course as very hard mainly because .
  • The , and consistent studying.
  • One review sees a method behind his strict style, but the overall tone is strongly negative.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

Getting an A appears to require , and persistence through confusing lectures.

; there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

22/100

The chemistry content is described as very hard, especially because students feel the .

, and they consistently frame the class as difficult.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

15/100

One student directly warns not to miss class or .

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

22/100

Most students discourage taking him because the class feels hard and .

All recommendation evidence is from in-person reviews, with no online comparison.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

28/100

, but the difficulty and lack of easy-grade signals point to a strict experience.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews mention the course experience, and .

Workload

Heavy

25/100

Students mention a decent amount of homework and a lot of required reading before class.

Format shift

Workload .

Teaching experience

Awful

20/100

Two of three reviews say he is horrible or knows what he is doing.

Format shift

and is mostly negative.

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

Comments mention homework and reading but , so the .

Format shift

, and online evidence does not exist.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews describe a demanding, old-school chemistry class with and a need for .

Main concern

Students repeatedly say his teaching makes hard chemistry feel much harder.

What students said

“ and confuses everyone.”
CHEM151
“HE is horrible stay away!!!”
CHEM
“Tip, study, hustle your way through the class”
CHEM152

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove the final style.

Exam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

policy or format.

Exam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ and confuses everyone.”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 in-person reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, workload, and recommendation. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

20/100

“ and confuses everyone.”

⚠️ Difficulty

22/100

“this class is very (very, very, very) hard because of it.”

👎 Recommendation

22/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • old school professor, you might think ur doomed, but he just wants you to learn
  • and confuses everyone.
  • The guy knowns what he is doing.

Theme 2

📚 About Workload

  • amount of homework.
  • A lot of because this professor is horrible at teaching.
  • Tip, study, hustle your way through the class

Theme 3

🚫 About Recommendation

  • .
  • HE is horrible stay away!!!

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

58/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is moderate because there are only three old reviews, but their negative difficulty and teaching themes are consistent.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 52

Course coverage

CHEM1 review
CHEM1511 review
CHEM1521 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values