AI Rate Professor

English

Rita Hermann

ENGL091 · ENG091 · ENGL101 · ENG101 · ENGENG · ENG91 · ENGLI091 · 39 lifetime ratings

AI rating
22/100
RMP rating
2.0/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
4.1

The decision

unless you can teach yourself and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProVery confusingDisorganizedUnclear expectationsInconsistent gradingAvoid if possible
  • Most students describe the class as , and .
  • Some students say , but the teaching quality is the main problem.
  • professor.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

38/100

Some students call her an , but many , and stressful uncertainty that make an A unreliable.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

The English content may not be advanced, but and vague essay standards make the course feel difficult.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with no online comparison.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

45/100

Reviews do not clearly prove a , though some positive reviews mention going to class as part of doing well.

Only in-person reviews discuss class participation, and online evidence is absent.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

18/100

Most students explicitly because they found the and frustrating.

The and overwhelmingly negative.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

30/100

A few students say she is an easy grader, but and , and unclear standards.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

32/100

Students , and stress, though a few say the workload itself is not huge.

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Awful

22/100

The dominant pattern is that , and ineffective at explaining writing expectations.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

20/100

, and writing assignments rather than formal exams.

Format shift

All .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

39 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews are mostly negative, centered , and stressful class experiences.

Main concern

Students repeatedly say directions and .

What students said

“She is bad at teaching period. !”
ENG101
“The .”
ENGL091
“She is so confusing!”
ENG101

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove an , and most assessment comments focus on essays and written work.

Reviews do not clearly prove exam formatEssays and assignments dominate assessment evidence

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, webcam use, proctoring, open-book rules, midterms, or finals.

Exam policy not clearly provenEssay-focused course evidence
“Don't know what ”
ENGL091
“she gives you one week to rewrite papers when you have to write a whole new one at the same time.”
ENG091

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She is so she wants.”

Voice snapshots generated from 39 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

22/100

“She is bad at teaching period. !”

⚖️

30/100

“Her revisions look to be written by a 5 year old, and .”

👍 Recommendation Level

18/100

“ !”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She .
  • She is by far the
  • The .

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • , but you will be so !
  • so if you want to become a better writer she is the class to take.
  • I turned them in and got C-'s

Theme 3

⚠️ About Student Experience

  • PLEASE, FOR THE LOVE OF .
  • IT IS EXTREMELY STRESSFUL AND .
  • Please if

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

39

Recent reviews read by the AI

39

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is high because 39 in-person reviews span several years and show a consistent pattern despite a few positive outliers.

Inside 39 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 55
4 out of 52
3 out of 54
2 out of 58
1 out of 520

Course coverage

ENG09114 reviews
ENG1019 reviews
ENGL1017 reviews
ENGL0914 reviews
ENG912 reviews
Show 3 more courses
09101 review
ENGENG1 review
ENGLI0911 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values