AI Rate Professor

Not Specified

Desiree Cohen

MLT116 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
83/100
RMP rating
5.0/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

She appears like a strong choice if you want a supportive teacher, but the evidence base is very small.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyVery helpfulGreat teacherStudent-focusedNiceLimited evidence
  • Both reviews are highly positive and describe Cohen as helpful and nice.
  • Students give perfect quality ratings, but the comments .
  • Difficulty appears moderate based on ratings, with no strong evidence of an easy A.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

The reviews are positive but do not provide clear evidence that getting an A is especially easy.

All evidence comes from two brief in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Standard

55/100

Difficulty ratings are moderate and comments do not explain whether the material itself is easy or hard.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

The .

Only in-person reviews exist, and .

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

88/100

Both students rate her highly and describe her class and teaching positively.

Recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

55/100

, so the safest judgment is fair and uncertain.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

55/100

The comments do not mention workload, so workload cannot be judged beyond a moderate default.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Excellent

92/100

Both reviews praise the class or teacher, with one specifically noting that she listens and helps students.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews describe teaching.

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

Reviews do not mention exams, assignments, quizzes, or projects, so the .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

but strongly positive, emphasizing helpfulness and a good class experience.

Main concern

There is too .

What students said

“Great class”
MLT116
“ and .”
MLT116

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove exam format, proctoring, .

Exam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

policy or .

Exam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ and .”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and overall sentiment. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

92/100

“ and .”

👍 Recommendation Signal

88/100

“Great class”

📌 Evidence Limit

35/100

“Great teacher.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • and .
  • Great teacher.

Theme 2

👍 About Overall Experience

  • Great class
  • Great teacher.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

35/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is low because there are only two brief in-person reviews and .

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

MLT1162 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values