AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Ellen Green

MATH025 · MATH060 · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
74/100
RMP rating
4.0/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.3

The decision

if you can stay attentive and handle a quiet, sometimes uneven lecture style.

Best fit · Effort For RewardHelpful teacherFair gradingManageable homeworkMixed clarityEasy tests
  • Two students strongly praise Ellen Green as helpful, fair, and effective.
  • One student reports low volume, mistakes, and test questions not covered in class.
  • The course can be an easy A for students who pay attention and do the homework.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

82/100

Getting an A seems easy if students pay attention and .

Only in-person evidence exists, and it supports an easy A with basic effort.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

70/100

The math content appears manageable, though one student found lecture clarity and test coverage uneven.

but one negative clarity report.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews .

Only in-person reviews exist, but none clearly prove an .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

75/100

and fair tests, but one review warns about weak lecture delivery.

, and they are mostly positive with .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

78/100

Students describe her as as manageable, and tests as easy when prepared.

Format shift

Only in-person evidence exists, and it mostly suggests lenient or .

Workload

Light

80/100

One student says she cuts homework in half, and .

Format shift

Only in-person reviews exist, and they suggest a light to manageable workload.

Teaching experience

Good

78/100

She is praised as excellent and helpful, but one review reports poor audibility and mistakes.

Format shift

and one serious negative.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Reviews mention homework, tests, and and exams.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews mention assessments, and .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

, but one review raises concerns about clarity and test alignment.

Main concern

A dissatisfied student says she was hard to hear and made mistakes.

What students said

“Dr. Green is an excellent teacher.”
MATH025
“i sat in the front row and still couldn't hear her.”
MATH060
“If you pay attention and .”
MATH060

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Tests are described as easy by one student, but .

Easy TestsCoverage Concern

Assessment risk

Standard

65/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

calling tests easy and another reporting uncovered questions.

Easy TestsCoverage Concern
“ and .”
MATH060
“on the ”
MATH060

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If you pay attention and .”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and test experience. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

78/100

“Dr. Green is an excellent teacher.”

📈 Easy A Path

82/100

“If you pay attention and .”

⚠️ Clarity Concern

45/100

“i sat in the front row and still couldn't hear her.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • and very fair.
  • Really nice and really helpful.
  • she constantly made mistakes.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • and .
  • she would cut the
  • If you pay attention and .

Theme 3

🧪 About Tests

  • on the

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

58/100

Evidence confidence

Only , and they conflict on teaching clarity and test fairness.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

MATH0602 reviews
MATH0251 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values