AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Manushak Movsisyan

MATHBOTH · MATH103 · MATH115 · MATH026 · MATH70 · MATH075 · MATH070 · MATH140 · MATH058 · 26 lifetime ratings

AI rating
46/100
RMP rating
3.1/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.2

The decision

if , and handle uneven lectures.

Best fit · Self Taught ProHelpful If AskedAccent BarrierInconsistent TeachingHeavy HomeworkCurved Grades
  • Student experiences are sharply .
  • Many complaints focus on unclear explanations, accent issues, fast pacing, and test difficulty.
  • Some students , and direct help when they ask.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

56/100

Curves, dropped tests, and help, but , and self-study keep the A from being easy.

; there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Standard

42/100

The math content is manageable for prepared students but feels difficult when lectures are fast or unclear.

All course .

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

55/100

Attendance is not clearly mandatory, but .

.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

48/100

She is worth considering for independent students, but many reviews warn that her .

The recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

62/100

She often curves, drops the , but some students call grading unfair.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

30/100

Students repeatedly mention lots of , and heavy effort.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Average

50/100

She is helpful and patient for some students, but and language barriers.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

Balanced

62/100

Grades appear to involve , and dropped scores.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

26 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

and grading buffers offset by frequent complaints about clarity and workload.

Main concern

.

What students said

“ .”
MATH058
“she teaches very fast and is clueless on how to eaborate for students when they are having a hard time following.”
MATH070
“ and .”
MATH075

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exam rules vary by course, with and no calculators in some classes but .

Hard TestsCurved TestsDropped Lowest TestNo CalculatorsCheat Sheet Allowed In Some Classes

Assessment risk

Standard

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

grades, no calculators, and occasional cheat sheets, while proctoring and open-book rules are not clearly proven.

Hard TestsCurved TestsDropped Lowest TestNo CalculatorsCheat Sheet Allowed In Some Classes
“ .”
MATH070
“Absolutely no calcs or .”
MATH103
“Plus side, she let us use the cheat sheet from the textbook during the tests.”
MATH103

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If you ask a question that she deems common knowledge she looks at you like you're stupid.”

Voice snapshots generated from 26 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

50/100

“She knows the math but she was not good on teaching.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

48/100

“Choose another teacher if you can for your sake.”

⚖️

62/100

“ and .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • . She Will Help You Anytime You Ask.
  • , and just expects you to know them all.
  • Her accent made it hard to understand.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • The Workload And Textbook Use Is Very High Dont Fall Behind!!
  • .
  • if you study for them.

Theme 3

⚖️

  • Gives partial credit on wrong answers as long as the work is correct.
  • she gets rid of .
  • and does give random !

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

26

Recent reviews read by the AI

26

Lifetime ratings

85/100

Evidence confidence

Twenty-six in-person reviews provide enough detail and show a and unclear instruction.

Inside 26 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 57
4 out of 56
3 out of 54
2 out of 56
1 out of 53

Course coverage

MATH07010 reviews
MATH1036 reviews
MATH0584 reviews
MATH0261 review
MATH0751 review
Show 4 more courses
MATH1151 review
MATH1401 review
MATH701 review
MATHBOTH1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values