AI Rate Professor

Nursing

Sharon McMahan

NSN122 · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating
86/100
RMP rating
5.0/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.0

The decision

She looks like a strong choice for students who want a , but the sample is very small.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyApproachableKindInformativeStudent SupportiveLow Difficulty
  • The only review is strongly positive and describes her as funny, informative, kind, and approachable.
  • Difficulty is low, but there is no grade or workload detail.
  • Credibility is limited because there is only one review.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

70/100

The low difficulty rating suggests manageable effort, but the review does not directly prove an easy A.

All evidence comes from one in-person review, with no online evidence.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

72/100

The course appears manageable because the instructor is described as informative, approachable, and kind.

, so no format comparison is possible.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

The .

The , and there are no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

88/100

The lone student is highly enthusiastic and emphasizes kindness, clarity, and support.

Recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

60/100

The low , but the comment does not directly discuss grades.

Format shift

and in person only.

Workload

Light

72/100

The course seems manageable from the low difficulty rating, but workload is not described.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Excellent

92/100

The review strongly praises her as funny, informative, approachable, kind, and supportive.

Format shift

Teaching evidence comes from one in-person review with no online comparison.

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

The review does not describe exams, assignments, or clinical assessment structure.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

The , and informative professor.

Main concern

The evidence is based on only one student comment.

What students said

“She was awesome! and very kind.”
NSN122
“ !”
NSN122

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove exam format, proctoring, open-book rules, or .

Exam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

The policy.

Exam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She was awesome! and very kind.”

Voice snapshots generated from 1 review, highlighting teaching support and evidence limits. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

92/100

“She was awesome! and very kind.”

❤️ Student Support

88/100

“ !”

📉 Evidence Limit

25/100

“She was awesome! and very kind.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She was awesome! and very kind.
  • !

Theme 2

❤️ About Character

  • very approachable and very kind.
  • !

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

1

Recent reviews read by the AI

1

Lifetime ratings

25/100

Evidence confidence

Only , so the positive signal is useful but weak.

Inside 1 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

NSN1221 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values