AI Rate Professor

Physical Education

Sarah Ehrsam

KPET212 · KPET210 · KPET213 · 5 lifetime ratings

AI rating
100/100
RMP rating
5.0/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
4.8

The decision

if you want a feel manageable.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyCaring teacherClear testsEasy AHelpful mentorFun class
  • Students consistently describe her as , and willing to help.
  • The class is easy to pass or earn an A in if students follow study guides and complete required work.
  • , but students say they are useful for learning.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

WalkInThePark

96/100

Students say an A is very reachable because , and effort is rewarded generously.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Introductory

90/100

The material can be difficult, but students say and fun style make it easy to understand.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

70/100

as harshly enforced, but and participation appear important for learning.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

98/100

Students strongly recommend her because , and makes the class enjoyable.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Generous

95/100

Students , and little reason not to earn at least a B.

Format shift

.

Workload

Light

82/100

The workload appears manageable, with lab hours as the main recurring requirement.

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Excellent

99/100

Every review praises her patience, clarity, helpfulness, and ability to make the class fun.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

, and , suggesting a mix of exams and practical work.

Format shift

All .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In-person reviews are uniformly , and strong student support.

Main concern

, though students say they help learning.

What students said

“Shame on u if you dont earn an A in her classes.”
KPET212
“Her study !”
KPET213
“Offers easy too so there is no reason not to pass her class with at least a B.”
KPET210

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams appear student-friendly because students say study guides closely match the tests and .

Study Guides Match TestsClear Test Content

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

88/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, but do not clearly prove open-book, proctoring, webcam, or final exam policy.

Study Guides Match TestsClear Test Content
“Her study !”
KPET213
“she just cant be any more clear on her lectures n .”
KPET212

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ her students and wants you to learn sarah makes a difficult class fun and interesting makeing it easy”

Voice snapshots generated from 5 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

99/100

“Sarah is a great teacher! Very patient and knows what she is talking about.”

📈 Easy A Potential

96/100

“Shame on u if you dont earn an A in her classes.”

👍 Recommendation Strength

98/100

“She's Cool and her classes are fun. Not to mention I also learned a lot.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Very patient and knows what she is talking about.
  • .
  • She really wants everyone to do well.

Theme 2

📈

  • Her study !
  • Offers easy too so there is no reason not to pass her class with at least a B.
  • her class is not hard if you try

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

5

Recent reviews read by the AI

5

Lifetime ratings

72/100

Evidence confidence

Five consistent reviews give a , but the sample is small and older.

Inside 5 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 55
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

KPET2103 reviews
KPET2121 review
KPET2131 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values