AI Rate Professor

Anthropology

Adam Wetsman

ANTHR101 · ANTH101 · ANTH102 · ANTH103 · 6 lifetime ratings

AI rating
53/100
RMP rating
3.9/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.5

The decision

Take him if you can handle heavy work and , but if you need warm, detailed support.

Best fit · Effort For RewardLots of workTough graderOrganized lecturesLimited feedbackGrammar-focused
  • Students split between appreciating his organization and criticizing his workload and grading.
  • An A appears possible, but it requires steady work, careful writing, and meeting directions.
  • .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

38/100

An A is possible, but comments repeatedly say it takes dedication, time, and tolerance for .

All though some review text describes online course experiences.

Is the course easy?

Standard

45/100

The content is not described as impossible, but the workload and writing expectations make the course feel demanding.

All though some review text describes online course experiences.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

55/100

Reviews , so flexibility cannot be strongly proven.

All authoritative format evidence is in-person, with .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

52/100

Recommendation depends on whether students value organization enough to , and .

All though some review text describes online course experiences.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

28/100

Multiple students call him a hard or , though .

Format shift

as in-person.

Workload

Heavy

25/100

Students repeatedly mention lots of busy work, work overload, and major time commitment.

Format shift

All workload evidence is counted as in-person.

Teaching experience

Average

65/100

Students praise his organization and lectures, but and low helpfulness.

Format shift

All teaching evidence is counted as in-person.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

30/100

Reviews emphasize busy , and submitted work more than exams.

Format shift

All assessment evidence is counted as in-person.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

6 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

but demanding instructor with heavy work, tough grading, and mixed helpfulness.

Main concern

The main concern is workload and .

What students said

“Good teacher but lots of busy work. .”
ANTH102
“A LOT OF WORK! Dedication and time is required for an A.”
ANTHR101
“Grades very tough. Pick another teacher, not very cool at all.”
ANTH101

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove the structure.

Exam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person-counted reviews do not clearly prove .

Exam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Good teacher but lots of busy work. . .”

Voice snapshots generated from 6 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, workload, and grading. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

65/100

“ .”

⚖️

28/100

“Grades very tough. Pick another teacher, not very cool at all.”

📚 Workload Level

25/100

“A LOT OF WORK! Dedication and time is required for an A.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • .
  • this .
  • Every professor should be as good as you.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Good teacher but lots of busy work. .
  • Dedication and time is required for an A.
  • There was a good amount of work, but the .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

6

Recent reviews read by the AI

6

Lifetime ratings

70/100

Evidence confidence

Six reviews give a mixed but consistent workload and , though the evidence is old and format text conflicts with authoritative counts.

Inside 6 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 52
3 out of 52
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ANTH1012 reviews
ANTHR1012 reviews
ANTH1021 review
ANTH1031 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values