AI Rate Professor

Fire Technology

Howard Kaplan

FT101 · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating
10/100
RMP rating
1.0/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
5.0

The decision

unless you are prepared for a very difficult and poorly supported in-person course.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerPoor FocusVery HardLow Pass RateHigh Risk
  • The only review says the class does not focus on needed material.
  • The reported pass rate is extremely low, with only 3 of 17 students passing.
  • There is no online evidence, so all .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

5/100

Getting an A appears extremely unlikely because the only review reports that only 3 of 17 students were barely passing.

Evidence .

Is the course easy?

BrainBurner

10/100

The course appears very difficult because students reportedly were not taught what they needed to learn and most were not passing.

Evidence .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

The .

Evidence comes only from one in-person review, and .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

5/100

because the only student review directly says he is not a good professor and reports a very low pass rate.

Evidence .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

5/100

The reported pass rate of 3 out of 17 suggests very harsh outcomes or poor course support.

Format shift

Evidence .

Workload

Heavy

25/100

Workload is not directly described, but the extreme difficulty and low pass rate imply a heavy effort burden.

Format shift

Evidence .

Teaching experience

Awful

10/100

The only review says the professor is not good and does not focus on needed learning.

Format shift

Evidence .

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

The review does not clearly describe whether .

Format shift

Evidence .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

The and a very low pass rate.

Main concern

Students may struggle because the course reportedly does not focus on what they need to learn.

What students said

“He does not focus on what you need to learn.”
FT101
“Only 3 students passing out of 17, and barely.”
FT101

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove the .

Exam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Assessment risk

Varies

40/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

The format or policy.

Exam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Only 3 students passing out of 17, and barely.”

Voice snapshots generated from 1 review, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

10/100

“He does not focus on what you need to learn.”

⚠️ Grade Risk

5/100

“Only 3 students passing out of 17, and barely.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • This professor is not a good one.
  • He does not focus on what you need to learn.

Theme 2

📉 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Only 3 students passing out of 17, and barely.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

1

Recent reviews read by the AI

1

Lifetime ratings

25/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is low because there is only one old review, though it gives a specific pass-rate claim.

Inside 1 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

FT1011 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values