AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Amy Morrow

MA214 · MATHSTAT · MATH060 · MATH103 · MATH215 · MATH211 · MATH214 · CALCULUS · MATHSECN · MATH211CALC · MATH211CALC1 · CALC1 · STATS140 · CALCULUS1 · MATH140 · CALC · MA215 · 44 lifetime ratings

AI rating
49/100
RMP rating
3.2/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.6

The decision

Take Morrow if you are disciplined and willing to attend, practice, and follow policies closely, but if .

Best fit · Effort For RewardHelpful But StrictPowerPoint HeavyMixed ClarityHard ExamsEffort For Reward
  • Students are sharply split, with many praising her helpfulness while .
  • Grades can be good , and use review materials, but exams and policies can be demanding.
  • Statistics and lower-level courses sound easier than calculus and higher math courses.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

64/100

An A is realistic in some courses if , and use reviews, but harder courses and strict policies raise the cost.

All grade evidence is from in-person reviews, with no online comparison.

Is the course easy?

Standard

42/100

Statistics can feel easy with tools and review materials, but calculus and higher math are often described as fast, hard, and self-taught.

All evidence is in person, and difficulty varies strongly by course.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

38/100

as formally mandatory, but many reviews say missing class or being late hurts badly.

Only in-person reviews exist, and .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

50/100

Recommendations depend heavily on course level and learning style because students describe both strong help and serious frustration.

All and is highly mixed.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

47/100

, and high A rates, while others describe strict grading mistakes, hard exams, and no makeups.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews exist, and grading leniency varies by course.

Workload

Moderate

42/100

Workload ranges from very little homework in some statistics sections to lots of , and tedious algebra in harder math courses.

Format shift

All and varies by class.

Teaching experience

Average

54/100

Students often say she is helpful and prepared, but .

Format shift

Teaching evidence is entirely in person and strongly polarized.

Assessment method

Balanced

58/100

Reviews mention homework, , and classwork rather than one single assessment type.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

44 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

be helpful and grade fairly but often teaches fast, uses PowerPoints, and gives demanding exams.

Main concern

Students who need flexible policies or .

What students said

“Go to class every day and do the classwork and it is not hard to get an A.”
MATH140
“You will need to learn by yourself with the book.”
CALC1
“ .”
MATH140

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exam evidence is mixed, with some student-friendly supports like note sheets and posted old exams but many reports of and strict policies.

Note Sheet AllowedPrevious Exams PostedHard ExamsFinal Can Replace Lowest Test

Assessment risk

Standard

48/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, dropped or replaced low tests, and difficult exams, but do not clearly prove proctoring or open-book rules.

Note Sheet AllowedPrevious Exams PostedHard ExamsDropped Lowest Test
“she lets you have a note sheet for the exam.”
MATH140
“ .”
MATH140
“ ”
MATH140

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Go to class every day and do the classwork and it is not hard to get an A.”

Voice snapshots generated from 44 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and exams. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

54/100

“She was a good teacher.”

📈 Effort And Grades

64/100

“Easy A if you are not LAZY.”

⚠️

48/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Amazing teacher. .
  • The lectures are strictly powerpoint and quite boring.
  • She is not a good communicator at all and .

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty And Grades

  • If you study, attend class, and do the and quite easy to get an A.
  • You must do the homework and classwork to achieve a good grade.
  • Passing her class with a 'C' took me a lot of effort.

Theme 3

📝 About Exams And Policies

  • There are no surprises on the tests.
  • , so watch out.
  • Tells you exactly what you're going .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

44

Recent reviews read by the AI

44

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

There are 44 reviews across many years and courses, with detailed but polarized comments that .

Inside 44 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 516
4 out of 57
3 out of 55
2 out of 57
1 out of 59

Course coverage

MATH14012 reviews
MATH2116 reviews
MATH1034 reviews
2113 reviews
CALC12 reviews
Show 13 more courses
MATH0602 reviews
MATH211CALC2 reviews
MATHSECN2 reviews
STATS1402 reviews
CALC1 review
CALCULUS1 review
CALCULUS11 review
MA2141 review
MA2151 review
MATH211CALC11 review
MATH2141 review
MATH2151 review
MATHSTAT1 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

2

B+ 1 · B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values