AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Paige Highsmith

MATH025 · MATH58 · MATH058 · MTH025 · 24 lifetime ratings

AI rating
42/100
RMP rating
3.3/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.4

The decision

if you can , and a blunt teaching style.

Best fit · Effort For RewardClear explanationsHeavy homeworkStrict gradingPolarizing personalityTest pressure
  • Students and harsh classroom treatment.
  • , and tests are described as pressured or tightly timed.
  • but sometimes effective instructor for students who follow rules closely.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

32/100

An A appears possible only with , and strong test preparation.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Standard

42/100

The math content is basic to intermediate, but students often find the workload and testing pressure difficult.

All course .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

as strict and tied to her classroom expectations.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

48/100

Students recommend her when they value structure and , but many warn against her strictness and tone.

Recommendation and is strongly mixed.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

25/100

Students repeatedly describe , and and tests.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

22/100

Many students mention lots of review assignments.

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Average

55/100

, but reviews also describe discouraging comments, intimidation, and inconsistent student support.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Reviews emphasize both frequent homework and dominates.

Format shift

All .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

24 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews describe clear math explanations but , and uneven treatment of students.

Main concern

The main concern is a strict, sometimes discouraging classroom style with lots of homework.

What students said

“Math is hard, but she makes it very easy to understand, and prepares you well for the tests.”
MATH058
“ .”
MATH058
“Half of the and not enough testing time!”
MATH058

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

and limited testing time, while specific book or proctoring rules are not clearly proven.

Hard TestsShort Testing TimeNo Late Homework

Assessment risk

Strict

30/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and strict assignment rules but do not clearly prove book or proctoring policy.

Hard TestsShort Testing TimeStrict Homework Rules
“ and she only allows a short period of time.”
MATH058
“ and not enough testing time!”
MATH58

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Math is hard, but she makes it very easy to understand, and prepares you well for the tests.”

Voice snapshots generated from 24 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and classroom tone; credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

55/100

“She teaches slow and .”

📚 Workload Pressure

22/100

“Lots and lots of homework.”

⚖️

25/100

“she is a , and gives out so .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She teaches slow and .
  • She does a great job breaking done the processes and steps.
  • She does teach well.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • .
  • Half of the and not enough testing time!
  • you will pass if you do all that is told, and dont talk.

Theme 3

⚠️ About Classroom Experience

  • Very intimidating.
  • She will embarress you in front of everyone.
  • ... .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

24

Recent reviews read by the AI

24

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is high because 24 detailed in-person reviews span several years and show consistent themes despite polarized opinions.

Inside 24 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 511
4 out of 52
3 out of 52
2 out of 53
1 out of 56

Course coverage

MATH02512 reviews
MATH05810 reviews
MATH581 review
MTH0251 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values