AI Rate Professor

English

K Dawson

ENGLISH101 · ENG091 · ENGLISH91 · ENG102 · ENG101 · ENG103 · 6 lifetime ratings

AI rating
24/100
RMP rating
2.0/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.5

The decision

unless you are comfortable managing an and inconsistent support.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerHarsh graderBusy workUnclear feedbackSlow communicationMixed leniency
  • Most students describe unclear teaching, rambling explanations, and .
  • Workload is essay-heavy and includes busy work, with .
  • A minority found her lenient with late work and manageable online or hybrid assignments, but the overall tone is strongly negative.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

32/100

Getting an A appears difficult because students , and a heavy writing load.

All counted reviews are in person, though some comments describe hybrid or online experiences under the authoritative in-person count.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

35/100

The English content may not be conceptually advanced, but the and .

All format-counted evidence is in person, with no separate online review count to compare.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

48/100

, but late work can be accepted in at least one review while missed work caused problems in another.

Only in-person-counted reviews mention attendance or late-work effects.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

28/100

Most students do not recommend her because of rambling , and .

Recommendation evidence comes only from the in-person-counted review set.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

25/100

and , while one review says she is not strict and allows late work.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

24/100

Students mention pointless busy , and a final.

Format shift

The workload evidence is entirely in person by authoritative count.

Teaching experience

Poor

35/100

Most comments describe boring, rambling, unhelpful instruction, although two students found her good or recommendable.

Format shift

All teaching-experience evidence comes from in-person-counted reviews.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

The class , and writing assignments, with exams mentioned less often.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

6 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person-counted reviews are mostly negative, , and poor feedback, with two more positive exceptions.

Main concern

, and harsh grading.

What students said

“She assigns a ton of essays, but grades harshly.”
ENG102
“ .”
ENG101
“Your allowed to turn in assignments late.”
ENG091

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention a midterm and final but do not clearly prove open-book, proctoring, Lockdown Browser, or .

MidtermFinalEssays

Assessment risk

Standard

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and a final, but exam format and proctoring are not clearly proven.

MidtermFinalEssays
“There are and a final.”
ENG103

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ enjoy English or not.”

Voice snapshots generated from 6 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and communication; credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

35/100

“Very unhelpful.”

⚖️

25/100

“She assigns a ton of essays, but grades harshly.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

28/100

“ !!!!”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She rambles all class, and give pointless busy work.
  • .

Theme 2

📚 About Workload

  • She assigns a ton of essays, but grades harshly.
  • pointless busy work and .be aware!
  • There's a hard at all.

Theme 3

⚖️ About Leniency

  • Your allowed to turn in assignments late.
  • Does not grade on time.
  • she said it was my responsibility to ask the students what I missed and not her.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

6

Recent reviews read by the AI

6

Lifetime ratings

56/100

Evidence confidence

The sample is small with only 6 reviews, but the negative comments are detailed and consistent enough to support a medium-confidence profile.

Inside 6 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 52
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 54

Course coverage

ENG0911 review
ENG1011 review
ENG1021 review
ENG1031 review
ENGLISH1011 review
Show 1 more courses
ENGLISH911 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values