AI Rate Professor

Nursing

Susan Thompson

NRSGFUND · FUND110 · NURS120 · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
62/100
RMP rating
4.0/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.7

The decision

if you want a knowledgeable nursing instructor and are ready to read heavily for .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerHelpful Clinical TeacherHard TestsLots of ReadingNo Study GuidesEasily Annoyed
  • Students praise her nursing knowledge, humor, and willingness to help after class.
  • , and often lack study guides.
  • Some students report favorites, impatience with questions, and getting off topic.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

38/100

An A appears possible, but students must do a lot of reading and prepare broadly for .

All .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

35/100

The , and requires knowing many chapters in detail.

All course .

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

55/100

Reviews do not clearly prove a , though class participation and asking questions matter.

Only in-person reviews mention class behavior, with .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

70/100

She is worth it for students who value strong knowledge and help, but not for .

Recommendation and is positive but qualified.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

32/100

Hard tests, broad chapter coverage, and if success is possible.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

28/100

Students repeatedly mention lots of reading and .

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Good

74/100

She is knowledgeable, funny, and helpful after class, but impatience and favoritism limit the experience.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

82/100

Reviews and reading preparation, with little assignment evidence.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews show strong teaching knowledge and clinical value, but and .

Main concern

.

What students said

“She is an awesome teacher.”
NURS120
“ ”
NRSGFUND

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

The because tests cover many chapters, study guides are not provided, and students must prepare broadly.

Hard TestsNo Study GuidesBroad Chapter Coverage

Assessment risk

Strict

28/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

chapters with no study guides.

Hard TestsNo Study GuidesBroad Chapter Coverage
“ ”
NRSGFUND
“ .”
FUND110

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She is an awesome teacher. and will stay after to help you understand a topic.”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

74/100

“ and will stay after to help you understand a topic.”

📚 Workload Pressure

28/100

“ .”

📝

28/100

“she doesnt give you studyguides.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She is an awesome teacher.
  • She is also a great clinical teacher.
  • Prof Tomphson is very funny but is also easily annoyed.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • do the reading and youll be fine.
  • .

Theme 3

❤️ About Classroom Experience

  • she has her favorites.
  • She doesnt like when you ask too many questions in class and will tell you to ask after class.
  • she also gives lots of breaks which help you stay focused

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

58/100

Evidence confidence

Only , but they are detailed and consistent about teaching strengths and test difficulty.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 51
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

FUND1101 review
NRSGFUND1 review
NURS1201 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values