AI Rate Professor

Communication

Robin McGehee

COMM8 · COMM009 · COMM001 · GROUPCOMM8 · COMM4 · COMM004 · COMM008 · SPEECH001 · 92 lifetime ratings

AI rating
88/100
RMP rating
4.5/5
Take again
84.21%
Difficulty
2.0

The decision

She is a strong choice for students who want a comfortable communication class, but online students should expect group work and .

Best fit · Beginner FriendlySupportive speaker coachMostly easy AGroup projectsGreat feedbackSome grading inconsistency
  • Most students praise her as supportive, funny, and especially good for nervous public speakers.
  • Grades are usually easy with , and effort, but recent online reviews complain about tough or .
  • Online sections have more friction around group coordination and communication than in-person sections.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

84/100

Most students earn high grades by completing speeches, projects, and assignments, though some recent online .

consistently, while online evidence is mixed by recent grading complaints.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

79/100

The , and she often helps nervous speakers feel comfortable and prepared.

Both formats are generally manageable, but online group coordination makes some online sections feel less easy.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

63/100

Some classes allow flexibility or online materials, but speeches, participation, group meetings, and .

Online reviews raise flexibility concerns about peer or in-person meetings, while and speeches.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

86/100

Most students recommend her because , and makes public speaking less stressful.

In-person recommendation is very strong, while online recommendation is still positive overall but and communication complaints.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

73/100

Many students call grading easy or generous, but recent online and a .

Format shift

In-person reviews lean lenient, while online reviews are .

Workload

Light

78/100

Work is usually speeches, projects, short papers, critiques, or assignments that students describe as easy and manageable.

Format shift

In-person workload is usually light, while online workload can feel heavier because of group coordination and repeated assignments.

Teaching experience

Excellent

90/100

Students widely describe her as helpful, funny, caring, and effective at easing public speaking anxiety.

Format shift

Teaching praise is strongest in person, while online reviews are positive overall but include more communication complaints.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

28/100

Grades appear , and participation rather than traditional exams.

Format shift

Both formats emphasize assignments and speeches, with midterm.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

31 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In-person reviews strongly praise her for , and keeping assignments manageable.

Main concern

Students still need to complete speeches, participate, and manage some group work.

What students said

“She made this class enjoyable and less nerve-racking!”
COMM001
“She is really nice! a ”
COMM001

Remote format

Online

19 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online reviews are mostly positive about easy work and feedback, but , and weaker communication.

Main concern

Online students may , and .

What students said

“Was a and gave bad grades with ”
COMM001
“ class and removes the flexibility students rely on.”
COMM008

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

because assessment is mostly speeches, projects, papers, and critiques, with only limited test mentions and .

SpeechesProjectsShort PapersNotes Allowed MidtermFew Tests Mentioned

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

82/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and one notes-allowed midterm, but do not clearly prove closed-book or proctoring rules.

In-Person SpeechesShort PapersGroup PresentationsNotes Allowed Midterm
“We did have a midterm but let us use our notes”
COMM8
“About 4-5 speeches during the semester.”
COMM001

Online

Online reviews mention speeches, recorded speeches, assignments, and critiques, but do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, Lockdown Browser, open-book, or .

Recorded SpeechesOnline SpeechesAssignmentsSpeech Critiques
“Had to watch lectures and complete speeches.”
COMM001
“like 3 recorded speechs and speech critques for celebs at graduations.”
COMM008

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She made this class enjoyable and less nerve-racking!”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and communication. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

90/100

“Robin Helped me become a better speaker and use my voice when it matters most.”

📈 Easy Grade Path

84/100

“Overall, I'd say pretty easy class.”

⚖️

73/100

“She clearly states what her assignments are, she grades generously and and every assignment.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She made this class enjoyable and less nerve-racking!
  • !
  • She really helps you do great in her class and learn a lot.

Theme 2

📈 About Grades and Work

  • Easy grade, especially if you want to get this public speaking class over with.
  • and you will pass the class.
  • We prob had like 20 assignments in 6 weeks but they were so easy.

Theme 3

⚠️ About Online Concerns

  • Inconsistent in
  • Only bad thing is how slow she grades work
  • class and removes the flexibility students rely on.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

92

Lifetime ratings

96/100

Evidence confidence

The rating is highly credible because 50 reviews include many detailed comments across online and in-person formats, though recent online complaints add meaningful nuance.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 568
4 out of 513
3 out of 54
2 out of 53
1 out of 55

Course coverage

COMM00131 reviews
COMM0088 reviews
COMM0046 reviews
COMM0091 review
COMM41 review
Show 3 more courses
COMM81 review
GROUPCOMM81 review
SPEECH0011 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

47 reported outcomes

A range

37

A+ 8 · A 22 · A- 7

B range

8

B+ 4 · B 3 · B- 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Not sure yet 1 · Rather not say 1