AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

David Jones

STA26736 · MATH066 · MAT021 · CSCI002 · MATH065 · MATH035 · MATH054 · MATH154 · CSCI001 · MATH021 · MATH21 · MATH067 · 260 lifetime ratings

AI rating
100/100
RMP rating
4.8/5
Take again
96.92%
Difficulty
2.7

The decision

Take Jones if you want a and rewards consistent effort.

Best fit · Effort For RewardClear lecturesVery accessibleExtra creditRecorded resourcesFunny and caring
  • Students overwhelmingly praise Jones for , and strong support outside class.
  • Grades are very reachable when students use the , and ask for help.
  • Workload can feel heavy, especially online, but late flexibility and reduce the pressure.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

88/100

An A is very achievable through homework, , recorded lectures, and help, but students still need steady effort.

Both formats support easy grades, with online students warning more about homework pacing and .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

76/100

Jones makes math easier with and resources, even when the subject itself is naturally hard.

, while in-person reviews emphasize lectures and live help.

Is attendance flexible?

Optional

91/100

Multiple students say , though attending still helps.

, while online reviews rely on recorded lectures and Canvas access.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

98/100

Students strongly recommend him because , and gives many ways to succeed.

Recommendation is extremely strong in both online and in-person reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Generous

90/100

, late flexibility, partial credit, and .

Format shift

Both formats mention and fair grading, with in-person reviews adding partial credit and .

Workload

Moderate

58/100

and sometimes heavy, but students usually call it manageable with good pacing.

Format shift

Online , while in-person workload varies by course and .

Teaching experience

Excellent

98/100

Students repeatedly describe his teaching as , and unusually helpful.

Format shift

Online students value videos and quick responses, while , and accessibility.

Assessment method

Balanced

64/100

, and exams, with some sections strongly test-heavy.

Format shift

In-person reviews mention unit exams and , while online and Canvas work.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

30 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person students describe him as funny, clear, flexible, and but exams often important.

Main concern

, so students still need to understand the concepts.

What students said

“Attendance was entirely optional, and the questions split between two two-hour blocks of time on different days”
MATH067
“If you pay attention in lecture, and do the .”
MATH154

Remote format

Online

20 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online students praise , and strong Canvas resources, though several warn not to procrastinate on homework.

Main concern

and if left until the last minute.

What students said

“The and easy to follow, with some funny bits sprinkled in to keep your attention.”
MATH035
“If you put in the work, you will get a good grade.”
MAT021

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

, but they do not clearly prove strict proctoring or .

Unit ExamsMidterm And Final WeightQuizzes MentionedNo Clear Online Proctoring Evidence

Assessment risk

Standard

66/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and , and occasional pop quizzes, but do not clearly prove closed-book or strict proctoring rules.

Unit ExamsMidterm And Final WeightPop Quizzes Mentioned
“All of the or .”
MATH067
“The midterm and Final were worth 70% of your grade, and homework was 30%.”
MATH021

Online

Online reviews mention homework, quizzes, and Canvas work, but do not clearly prove .

Quizzes MentionedNo Clear Online Proctoring Evidence
“ !! You get for participating!”
MATH035

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ ”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and support. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

98/100

“Professor Jones is great at teaching and I have to say exceptionally good at breaking things down for easier comprehension.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

98/100

“If there was any professor :)”

⚖️ Grade Value

88/100

“As long as you do the work it's almost impossible to fail.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He made the summer class I took actually fun and I felt like I learned a lot from him.
  • His lectures are straight forward and easy to follow, as he writes out the lesson on projection.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty And Grades

  • If you pay attention in lecture, and do the .
  • It was A LOT of work because I had to understand how to do the math problems but if you are good at math then this is the .

Theme 3

❤️ About Support

  • He also takes his own time out of his life to tutor on Saturdays.
  • He will help as much as you need. Always available

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

260

Lifetime ratings

96/100

Evidence confidence

Fifty recent reviews across online and and highly consistent evidence.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 5239
4 out of 513
3 out of 52
2 out of 50
1 out of 56

Course coverage

MATH02116 reviews
MATH0358 reviews
MAT0217 reviews
MATH0656 reviews
MATH0673 reviews
Show 7 more courses
Math0542 reviews
MATH0662 reviews
MATH1542 reviews
CSCI0011 review
CSCI0021 review
MATH211 review
STA267361 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

49 reported outcomes

A range

35

A+ 18 · A 11 · A- 6

B range

11

B+ 5 · B 6

C range

3

C+ 1 · C 2

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values