AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Liana Craven

MATH200 · MATH230 · MATH065 · MARH154 · CALC1 · MATH44 · MATH070 · CALC2 · MATH154 · MATH021 · MATH21 · 70 lifetime ratings

AI rating
18/100
RMP rating
2.5/5
Take again
36.17%
Difficulty
3.7

The decision

unless you are comfortable with , and learning much of the material independently.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerStrict gradingHeavy workloadLecture heavyLate or unavailablePolarizing teaching style
  • Reviews are sharply negative overall, with , and delayed grades.
  • Some students who are strong in math or like and prepares them well.
  • Getting a good grade often requires , and outside study.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

32/100

An A is possible, but students say it requires heavy , and tolerance for .

Online evidence is harsher and less supportive, while grades by following her exact process.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

35/100

The math content is often made harder by lecture-heavy , and the need for outside help.

Online reviews stress weak videos and self-teaching, while and exact note-based expectations.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

15/100

because students say lectures build on each other and missing class can make passing unlikely.

, while online evidence focuses more on weekly notes and quizzes.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

30/100

because they describe harsh grading, heavy workload, poor attitude, lateness, and weak support.

Both formats trend negative, with online reviews especially critical of availability and and attitude.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

18/100

Students repeatedly say she docks points for minor details, expects work done her way, and gives little partial credit.

Format shift

also tying it to quizzes and anti-cheating concerns.

Workload

Heavy

22/100

Reviews frequently mention lots of , and long study demands.

Format shift

Online reviews mention weekly notes and quizzes, while and lecture preparation.

Teaching experience

Poor

32/100

Some students praise her clarity, but many describe , and limited support.

Format shift

Online reviews focus on unavailable support and weak videos, while , and lecture-heavy delivery.

Assessment method

Balanced

63/100

Assessment appears , and strict written work checks.

Format shift

Online reviews mention quizzes and tests every week, while , and finals.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

45 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews are mostly negative but mixed, with complaints about lateness and .

Main concern

Students repeatedly describe her as late, blunt, picky, and difficult for anyone who needs support.

What students said

“She was late every single class and was so unprofessional.”
MATH021
“She is a and when you ask for help, she simply says that you should already know it from past classes.”
CALC1
“She is strict, she is blunt, she is DEFINITELY a .”
MATH154

Remote format

Online

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are mostly negative, citing strict , and poor availability.

Main concern

and limited support in a difficult workload.

What students said

“She has not graded over 70 percent of my assignments, as of my writing this.”
CALC1
“ .”
MATH065
“ online quizzes/tests and theirs a new one every week.”
MATH021

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exam and quiz policies are strict because students report course, and little partial credit.

Strict Online Quizzes And TestsWeekly QuizzesNo Multiple Choice TestsLittle Partial CreditNo Clear Proctoring Evidence

Assessment risk

Strict

27/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

choice, study guides, and little partial credit, but do not clearly prove closed-book rules.

No Multiple Choice TestsStudy GuidesLittle Partial CreditFinal Exam Risk
“ .”
MATH154
“gave almost no partial credit.”
MATH154
“the as a class killed my grade.”
MATH230

Online

Online reviews mention strict online quizzes and tests, but do not clearly .

Strict Online Quizzes And TestsWeekly QuizzesNo Clear Proctoring Evidence
“ online quizzes/tests and theirs a new one every week.”
MATH021
“she .”
MATH065

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If you struggle with with this teacher.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences; credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

32/100

“ .”

⚖️

18/100

“She grades very, VERY specific.”

📚 Workload Pressure

22/100

“HOURS of videos, and a LOT of busy work.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Could be worse. Not mean but unenthusiastic, lectures are all notes.
  • She teaches and .
  • Take this class if you want to be taught the BARE MINIMUM.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty And Grades

  • .
  • You either get a 0% or 100% on tests, you go back and forth until you fix all the mistakes.
  • She grades every minor detail which will hurt you in the long run if you don't listen to how she wants it done.

Theme 3

⚠️ About Student Experience

  • She was late every single class and was so unprofessional.
  • I always dreaded going to her class.
  • If ur good at math, you might be fine, but for those that her.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

70

Lifetime ratings

94/100

Evidence confidence

Fifty reviews across many years provide detailed, consistent evidence of and polarized student experiences.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 511
4 out of 510
3 out of 56
2 out of 519
1 out of 524

Course coverage

MATH02111 reviews
MATH1548 reviews
MATH0707 reviews
CALC16 reviews
MATH2005 reviews
Show 6 more courses
MATH2304 reviews
MATH0653 reviews
MARH1542 reviews
MATH442 reviews
CALC21 review
MATH211 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

38 reported outcomes

A range

15

A+ 3 · A 7 · A- 5

B range

5

B+ 1 · B 4

C range

2

C+ 1 · C 1

D range

3

D+ 1 · D 1 · D- 1

F

3

F 3

No letter grade reported

10

Drop/Withdrawal 5 · Not sure yet 4 · Rather not say 1