AI Rate Professor

Psychology

Josh Muller

PSY005 · GENERALPSYCH · PSY001 · PSY029 · PSYCH001 · PSY29 · RESEARCH · 183 lifetime ratings

AI rating
85/100
RMP rating
4.6/5
Take again
87.13%
Difficulty
2.9

The decision

if , and accept a demanding but supportive professor.

Best fit · Effort For RewardEngaging lecturesStrict attendanceLecture-heavy examsTough but supportiveGroup project pressure
  • Students , and memorable lectures.
  • Attendance and note-taking matter heavily because .
  • Research Methods is much harder than general psychology because of and major group projects.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

62/100

An A is realistic with , and , but Research Methods often requires serious effort and strong group work.

Online evidence is mixed, while in-person evidence shows easier grades in PSY001 and much harder effort in PSY029.

Is the course easy?

Standard

54/100

General psychology feels manageable because , but Research Methods is repeatedly described as hard and demanding.

Online and , but the hardest comments cluster around Research Methods in both formats.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

12/100

Attendance is repeatedly described as mandatory, strictly enforced, and .

Both formats mention mandatory attendance, with in-person comments giving the clearest evidence of strict enforcement.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

87/100

Most students recommend him because his lectures are , and he pushes students to learn.

, while online reviews include both strong praise and serious concern about strict testing.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

50/100

Grading is often strict, especially in Research Methods, but students , and .

Format shift

grading, while online reviews include both citation strictness and exam difficulty.

Workload

Moderate

45/100

Workload ranges from manageable weekly reading or homework in PSY001 to heavy projects, papers, and exams in PSY029.

Format shift

Online reviews mention reading and complicated assignments, while and lecture notes.

Teaching experience

Excellent

88/100

Students repeatedly call , and supportive despite complaints about bluntness and strictness.

Format shift

Both formats show strong teaching praise, though online has fewer reviews and more variation.

Assessment method

Balanced

66/100

Assessment , but , and participation also matter in many sections.

Format shift

In-person PSY001 is more exam-and-activity based, while PSY029 adds major group projects and papers; online evidence includes exams and assignments.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

45 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews strongly praise his lectures and support, but repeatedly warn that , and .

Main concern

Strict attendance and .

What students said

“His exams were strictly based on his lectures, but he doesn't post his notes so .”
PSY001
“He is a .”
PSY029

Remote format

Online

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online reviews are mixed, with and support in easier courses but and group-work stress in harder courses.

Main concern

Online students , and at least one proctored exam setup.

What students said

“He uses proctorio for tests.”
PSY005
“He puts the effort to help and .”
PSY001

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

and manageable with strong notes, but some courses lack study guides and one online review reports Proctorio.

Lecture-Based ExamsNo Study Guides In Some CoursesProctorio Mentioned OnlineNo Midterm Or Final In One CourseMultiple Choice Mentioned

Assessment risk

Standard

48/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and reviews do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, open-book, or closed-book rules.

Lecture-Based ExamsNo Study Guides In Some CoursesNo Midterm Or Final In One Course
“ ”
PSY001
“there are ”
PSYCH001

Online

, but one review explicitly reports Proctorio and no open-book exams.

ProctorioNo Open Book ExamsNo Study Guides
“No notes or !!”
PSY005
“He uses proctorio for tests.”
PSY005

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Astounding professor, by far the .”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and attendance. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

88/100

“He breaks things down in a way that makes it easy to understand and .”

👍 Recommendation Rate

87/100

“I 100% recommend taking his class.”

⚖️

50/100

“He is a .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Professor Muller is a great lecturer.
  • His lectures are always entertaining and he defines the concepts he is teaching perfectly.
  • He cared a lot for his students and was always inspiring.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty And Grades

  • If you are looking for an easy class, this isn't it.
  • and so .
  • He grades tough, but its all for good reason :)

Theme 3

📝 About Exams And Attendance

  • The SO .
  • as long as you don't miss lectures and

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

183

Lifetime ratings

93/100

Evidence confidence

Fifty recent reviews across multiple courses give , and workload.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 5146
4 out of 525
3 out of 54
2 out of 52
1 out of 56

Course coverage

PSY02921 reviews
PSY00115 reviews
PSY298 reviews
PSY0053 reviews
GENERALPSYCH1 review
Show 2 more courses
PSYCH0011 review
RESEARCH1 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

48 reported outcomes

A range

15

A+ 2 · A 8 · A- 5

B range

19

B+ 10 · B 7 · B- 2

C range

10

C+ 3 · C 7

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

4

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Incomplete 1 · Not sure yet 2