AI Rate Professor

English

Lucia Tejeda

ENG001301 · ENG360 · ENG001 · ENG01 · ENGL02 · ENG301 · ENGLISH360 · ENG002 · ENGL001 · 43 lifetime ratings

AI rating
20/100
RMP rating
2.4/5
Take again
33.33%
Difficulty
4.1

The decision

if you want a demanding writing course and , and limited flexibility.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTough graderHeavy writing workloadNo late workStrict attendanceMixed feedback quality
  • Many students describe harsh grading, no , and no late work as the main grade risks.
  • Workload is heavy for an introductory English course, especially papers, reading, and weekly assignments.
  • A minority of and structure, but recent reviews are strongly negative.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

18/100

Getting an A appears very hard because students repeatedly mention harsh paper grading, no , no late work, and strict grammar expectations.

Both formats show low Easy A evidence, with online reviews emphasizing workload and .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

The course content is often described as above beginner level, with , and demanding reading or participation.

Online reviews describe the course as assignment-heavy, while feels like an English major class.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

12/100

Attendance and participation appear strict because multiple students say missing class or a day can hurt the grade.

, while online reviews also mention missed days or assignments lowering grades.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

24/100

Most recent students warn against taking her because the , and lack of flexibility make the class stressful.

Both formats include warnings, though in-person reviews also include older positive recommendations from students who wanted rigorous writing instruction.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

12/100

Students repeatedly call her a tough or and say small .

Format shift

Harsh grading appears in and online assignment feedback.

Workload

Overwhelming

15/100

Reviews repeatedly cite lots of , and excessive weekly assignments.

Format shift

Online reviews stress being overwhelmed by weekly assignments, while , and reading.

Teaching experience

Poor

32/100

Some students praise her guidance, but many recent reviews , and poor responsiveness.

Format shift

Online teaching is criticized more for email and , while and recent complaints.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

22/100

Grades , and writing assignments rather than clearly documented exams.

Format shift

Both formats focus on papers and tests.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

28 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews are polarized, with older students praising her rigor but many recent and stress.

Main concern

, and no grade recovery options dominate the complaints.

What students said

“Essays worth 50% of your grade.”
ENG001301
“She doesn't offer any and won't accept late work.”
ENG001

Remote format

Online

15 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are mostly negative, , and limited useful feedback.

Main concern

Students report , and poor online support.

What students said

“This class was ridiculously tough. She accepts no late work, and no .”
ENG001
“Way to much work, insane amount of ”
ENG001

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention tests and pop quizzes, but they do not clearly prove open-book, .

Test Heavy MentionedPop Quiz MentionedExam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Assessment risk

Varies

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and pop quizzes, but comments do not clearly prove the full exam format or requirements.

Pop Quiz MentionedTest Heavy Mentioned
“Honestly, this is one of the rudest teachers I've encountered in a while.”
ENG001

Online

Online reviews mention tests or quizzes but do not clearly prove proctoring, .

Quiz MentionedExam Policy Not Clearly Proven
“She gets questions wrong in ”
ENG001

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“This class was ridiculously tough. She accepts no late work, and no .”

Voice snapshots generated from 43 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and flexibility. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

32/100

“ , yet does not give any guidance to do better next time.”

⚖️

12/100

“Going to be the reason I fail my first class ever, never had such a .”

📚 Workload Pressure

15/100

“You will literally be drowning in school work.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Mrs. Tejeda is a very good teacher willing to help.
  • She never answers emails, always comments rudely on class discussions, and gives you so much work.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • No to try to bump up your grade.
  • If you are looking for an easy A, you won't get it.
  • She doesn't accept late work or .

Theme 3

📝 About Workload

  • Way to much work, insane amount of
  • So and no room for mistakes because you will fail.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

43

Recent reviews read by the AI

43

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

The rating is based on 43 reviews across many years, with strong , and flexibility concerns.

Inside 43 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 510
4 out of 54
3 out of 52
2 out of 55
1 out of 522

Course coverage

ENG00118 reviews
ENGL0016 reviews
ENG0013015 reviews
ENG0024 reviews
ENG3013 reviews
Show 4 more courses
ENG012 reviews
ENG3602 reviews
ENGLISH3602 reviews
ENGL021 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

39 reported outcomes

A range

7

A+ 1 · A 4 · A- 2

B range

13

B+ 6 · B 3 · B- 4

C range

6

C+ 2 · C 4

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

13

Drop/Withdrawal 4 · Incomplete 1 · Not sure yet 6 · Rather not say 2