AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Randy Qualls

MATH · MATH200 · MATH230 · MATH070 · MATH360 · MATH035 · 16 lifetime ratings

AI rating
100/100
RMP rating
4.4/5
Take again
91.67%
Difficulty
2.3

The decision

if you want a fair math class where showing up, practicing, and asking questions usually pays off.

Best fit · Effort For RewardClear math explanationsPractice tests matchLenient gradingTest heavyPatient support
  • Students overwhelmingly recommend Qualls for clear, patient math instruction and .
  • Grades are very reachable , and use practice tests.
  • The course is exam-heavy, but tests are often described as .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

85/100

High grades are common because tests are fair and practice-based, but students still need to attend and do the work.

, while the single online review supports clarity but gives limited grading detail.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

77/100

Math , and patient help, though prior math comfort still helps.

, but in-person reviews provide much more evidence about class difficulty.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

45/100

Attendance is repeatedly framed as important for passing, but reviews do not prove a .

, while the single online review does not clarify attendance.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

92/100

Students recommend him because he explains math clearly, gives fair preparation, and helps students who ask questions.

Recommendation evidence is overwhelmingly in-person, with one positive online review.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

86/100

Students report , and practice tests that closely match exams.

Format shift

In-person reviews provide the strongest leniency evidence; .

Workload

Moderate

62/100

and sometimes heavy, but students usually describe it as achievable and useful for exams.

Format shift

and practice work often, while the online review focuses more on explanations.

Teaching experience

Excellent

91/100

Most students describe him as , and strong at explaining math.

Format shift

Both formats praise his explanations, but the .

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

82/100

Several reviews state tests dominate the grade, often around 75%, with homework as preparation or a smaller portion.

Format shift

, while online exam details are not clearly stated.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

15 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are , and help for students who put in effort.

Main concern

, and some students find long lectures or .

What students said

“his tests are 75% of your grade.”
MATH035
“Come to class, complete the work and you will have no problems.”
MATH

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

The single online review is very positive and and question support.

Main concern

Only one online review exists, so online-specific policies are not well established.

What students said

“ way that is easy to understand.”
MATH070

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are important, but students often describe them as fair, practice-based, and .

Practice Tests Similar To ExamsTests Are FairTests 75 Percent Of GradeChapter TestsNotes Used On Quizzes

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

82/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews describe test-heavy grading with and some lenient test handling.

Practice Tests Similar To ExamsTests 75 Percent Of GradeChapter TestsNotes Used On Quizzes
“his tests are 75% of your grade.”
MATH035
“The the test.”
MATH

Online

The single online review does not clearly prove exam .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Come to class, complete the work and you will have no problems.”

Voice snapshots generated from 16 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and grades. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

91/100

“He has a perfect way of explaining math so you understand it.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

92/100

“He makes it clear at the beginning of the semester that if as long as you're willing to come to class and put in the work you will have no problem passing.”

🧮

82/100

“The the test.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • His lectures are thorough and easy to understand.
  • He takes the time to thoroughly answer questions.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty And Grades

  • Really easy as long as you show up then you will pass the class.
  • As long as you put in the effort to do the , and pay attention, you'll pass this class easily.

Theme 3

📝 About Exams And Homework

  • HW is 25% of grade and tests are 75%.
  • I would say the and though there is a good amount of homework it is certainly achievable.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

16

Recent reviews read by the AI

16

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is high because 16 reviews span many years and mostly align, though only one online review limits format-specific confidence.

Inside 16 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 511
4 out of 53
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

MATH0356 reviews
MATH4 reviews
MATH2002 reviews
MATH2302 reviews
MATH0701 review
Show 1 more courses
MATH3601 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

14 reported outcomes

A range

10

A+ 4 · A 5 · A- 1

B range

4

B 3 · B- 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values