AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Danielle Alberti

MATH200 · MATH021 · MATH21 · MATH24726 · 29 lifetime ratings

AI rating
83/100
RMP rating
4.2/5
Take again
79.17%
Difficulty
2.2

The decision

if and can handle steady work, strict focus rules, and firm deadlines.

Best fit · Effort For RewardClear step-by-step teachingStrict classroom rulesLots of homeworkGood for math anxietyAttendance matters
  • Most students say and helps struggling students understand statistics.
  • The course can produce good grades, but students must keep up with , and attendance.
  • Her no-nonsense style, strict classroom expectations, and occasional online rigidity create a real mismatch for some students.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

70/100

Good grades are common, but they usually , and meeting strict deadlines.

Online reviews stress videos, assignments, and deadlines, while , and staying quiet and focused.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

66/100

Statistics becomes understandable because she teaches step by step, but the math content still requires practice and steady attention.

Both formats praise clear explanations, but online students mention time-consuming work and and class discipline.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

because students do classwork, homework, notes, and preparation in class, and absences are criticized.

, while online reviews focus on assignment windows rather than physical attendance.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

82/100

Most students recommend her because , but her strictness and workload make her a poor fit for some.

Online feedback is mostly positive with one severe complaint, while but repeatedly notes strict classroom expectations.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

62/100

Grades can be strong with effort and extra help, but , and deadlines are treated strictly.

Format shift

Online reviews mention reduced credit for late work and narrow windows, while and class conduct.

Workload

Moderate

48/100

Workload is moderate to heavy because many students mention , and time demands.

Format shift

Online reviews call the workload time-consuming, while lots of classwork.

Teaching experience

Good

84/100

, and effective for math-anxious students, but some students find her strict or inflexible.

Format shift

Online reviews praise lecture videos and organization with one major online-teaching complaint, while but note strict classroom control.

Assessment method

Balanced

58/100

, and review-style preparation, with neither exams nor assignments fully dominating.

Format shift

Online reviews mention homework, quizzes, and tests, while , and attendance-based work.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

23 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

, but they repeatedly note strict quiet rules, attendance dependence, and frequent homework.

Main concern

Students who dislike strict classroom control, daily work, or .

What students said

“NO TOLERANCE FOR ANY TALKING EVEN ABOUT THE WORK.”
MATH200
“ of the class work and .”
MATH021
“ and can be quite lengthy at times.”
MATH21

Remote format

Online

6 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

and organization, but one student strongly criticized narrow time windows, handwritten submissions, and lack of feedback.

Main concern

Online sections may require steady independent work, strict deadlines, and lots of assignments.

What students said

“ , and everything will be a breeze trust me.”
MATH021
“This class does take alot of your time but so you're able to do them ahead of time.”
MATH21
“be warned, she leaves very small windows of only a few hours.”
MATH021

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams and quizzes appear standard and well prepared for, with formulas provided in at least one in-person review and .

Tests And QuizzesReview TestFormulas ProvidedNo Clear Proctoring Evidence

Assessment risk

Standard

68/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and tests, review tests, and formulas provided, but do not clearly prove closed-book rules or strict proctoring.

Tests And QuizzesReview TestFormulas Provided
“Her tests are very easy and she always gives a lot too.”
MATH200
“ because the formulas are provided for you, so there's no need to memorize all of the equations.”
MATH21
“ .”
MATH021

Online

Online reviews mention tests and but do not clearly prove webcam use, Lockdown Browser, open-book rules, or proctoring policy.

TestsHomework QuizzesNo Clear Proctoring Evidence
“prepares you well .”
MATH021
“Only downfall is that she assigns coursework due early in the morning”
MATH021

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ NOT understand.”

Voice snapshots generated from 29 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and strictness; credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

84/100

“She explained it so well that I actually understood and started to like math!”

📚 Workload Reality

48/100

“ and can be quite lengthy at times.”

⚠️ Strict Classroom Fit

18/100

“NO TOLERANCE FOR ANY TALKING EVEN ABOUT THE WORK.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She goes through every problem in extreme depth, and then does several examples.
  • Her , and she works with you in class.
  • Very easy to understand and is very thorough in teaching.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Just do the work and turn it on time.
  • Was a good professor, but will make you work for the grade.
  • The only way not to pass is because no effort is made by the student.

Theme 3

📚

  • of the class work and .
  • Gives hw everyday but you get used to the routine
  • This class does take alot of your time but so you're able to do them ahead of time.

Theme 4

⚠️ About Strictness

  • She wants your full attention!
  • She is very intolerant of students speaking in class and takes it personal.
  • not a really good on dealing excused absences

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

29

Recent reviews read by the AI

29

Lifetime ratings

94/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is high because 29 reviews span many years, include both formats, and show consistent themes , and strictness.

Inside 29 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 519
4 out of 55
3 out of 50
2 out of 52
1 out of 53

Course coverage

MATH02116 reviews
MATH218 reviews
MATH2004 reviews
MATH247261 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

24 reported outcomes

A range

16

A+ 6 · A 9 · A- 1

B range

4

B+ 2 · B 1 · B- 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

4

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Not sure yet 2 · Rather not say 1