AI Rate Professor

Languages

Lisa Painter

ASL001 · COS126 · ASL2 · 9 lifetime ratings

AI rating
57/100
RMP rating
3.6/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

if you want an interactive ASL class, but be cautious with online sections because the workload and organization are inconsistent.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerAccessible outside classParticipation heavyGroup projectsMixed online experienceCaring but inconsistent
  • In-person students often praise her ASL teaching, accessibility, and caring style.
  • Online reviews are sharply mixed, with , and one very negative experience.
  • Success depends heavily , and keeping up with assignments.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

62/100

Many students earned A grades, but the , and keeping up with assignments.

, while online reviews describe heavier and less predictable effort.

Is the course easy?

Standard

55/100

ASL content is learnable with practice, but visual learning, grammar, vocabulary, and social participation make it more than an easy course.

Online sections feel harder due to organization and workload issues, while .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

Several reviews say attendance or participation is required for credit and missing class hurts performance.

; online reviews emphasize short deadlines rather than attendance.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

55/100

, but online organization and workload complaints create real hesitation.

, while online reviews are split and include severe criticism.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

55/100

Grades can be strong, but and , so leniency is inconsistent.

Format shift

and supportive, while as tougher and slow.

Workload

Heavy

35/100

Workload can be demanding, especially online, with group projects, participation, essays, and short assignment windows.

Format shift

Online reviews describe heavier workload and rushed deadlines, while .

Teaching experience

Average

66/100

, and effective in person, but online delivery receives major complaints.

Format shift

, while online evidence is inconsistent and includes one very negative review.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

30/100

Assessment appears driven , and practice rather than clearly described exams.

Format shift

Both formats emphasize assignments and participation; reviews .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

6 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews are mostly positive, emphasizing visual practice, group interaction, accessibility, and skill growth.

Main concern

, and social comfort matter a lot.

What students said

“be ready to socialize because she has you do a lot of group projects.”
ASL2
“you must attend class for credit and be involved in discussions.”
ASL2
“my ASL skills developed quickly.”
ASL2

Remote format

Online

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews and decent to extremely negative about workload and timing.

Main concern

Online workload, posting timing, technical issues, and .

What students said

“She sucked so bad, the online class was hell on earth.”
ASL2
“ because whenever I reached out I always heard back.”
ASL001
“ end of the Day Tuesday( Sometimes Wednesday) and they are due within 24 hours.”
ASL001

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove exam format, proctoring, .

Exam Policy Not Clearly ProvenAssignments and Participation Emphasized

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, open-note exams, quiz format, midterm format, or final format.

Online

Online reviews do not clearly prove webcam use, proctoring, Lockdown Browser, .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ if you want an interactive ASL class, but be cautious with online sections because the workload and organization are inconsistent.”

Voice snapshots generated from 9 reviews, highlighting key themes in format split, participation, workload, and teaching. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

66/100

“Amazing teacher - I learned so much from her and her teaching.”

👍 Recommendation Level

55/100

“ because whenever I reached out I always heard back.”

📚 Workload Pressure

35/100

“Her syllabus does not match the work load you will actually do.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Lisa is an absolutely wonderful person and teacher.
  • Shes just awesome! Takes her time for everyone to understand and slows down for us to understand.
  • Professor Painter provides a strong basis of grammar, NMMs, and vocabulary to help you successfully use ASL.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Workload

  • the online class was hell on earth.
  • end of the Day Tuesday( Sometimes Wednesday) and they are due within 24 hours.
  • Be respectful and pay attention.

Theme 3

🤝 About Participation

  • be ready to socialize because she has you do a lot of group projects.
  • you must attend class for credit and be involved in discussions.
  • Do be prepared to work with others every class too.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

9

Recent reviews read by the AI

9

Lifetime ratings

68/100

Evidence confidence

The rating is moderately credible because 9 reviews show clear format differences but the sample is small and opinions are mixed.

Inside 9 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 52
3 out of 52
2 out of 51
1 out of 51

Course coverage

ASL0014 reviews
ASL24 reviews
COS1261 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

7 reported outcomes

A range

7

A+ 3 · A 4

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values