AI Rate Professor

Criminal Justice

Laura Lathrop

Courses not reported · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
88/100
RMP rating
4.3/5
Take again
75%
Difficulty
1.3

The decision

if possible, because the and supportive while the online evidence is weak.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyEasy classCaringReal-life examplesReview before examsOnline disorganized
  • In-person students describe her as caring, easy, fun, and and exams.
  • The single online review , and unhelpful attendance memos.
  • The course appears very easy grade-wise, but format matters a lot.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

WalkInThePark

92/100

Grades are mostly A's and students repeatedly call the class easy, though the .

, while the lone online review got an A but disliked the organization.

Is the course easy?

Introductory

88/100

Students describe the course as very easy and relaxed, with .

In-person reviews make the course sound easy, while online .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

30/100

The , while in-person reviews mention participation matters but not strict penalties.

, while in-person evidence is less specific.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

86/100

, and engaging, despite one negative online review.

, while the single online review is not.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

86/100

The course looks grade-friendly, with mostly A grades and repeated comments that she is very easy.

Format shift

In-person reviews are clearly lenient, while but not harsh.

Workload

Light

82/100

The course is described as easy and relaxed, though the and .

Format shift

In-person workload appears light, while online workload feels harder because of .

Teaching experience

Good

84/100

In-person teaching is praised as caring and engaging, but the online review describes disengaged PowerPoint lectures and disorganization.

Format shift

In-person teaching evidence is excellent, while the single online review is poor.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

, and exams, suggesting a mix of assignments and exams.

Format shift

Online evidence mentions labs and homework, while , and exams.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In-person reviews are highly positive, describing her as caring, relaxed, fun, and .

Main concern

There is little detailed criticism in the in-person reviews, so the main limitation is sparse evidence.

What students said

“She always goes over the before the date.”
23710
“She's an excellent teacher. and very easy.”
23710

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The only online review is negative and describes unclear , and unhelpful attendance memos.

Main concern

Online organization and engagement are the main concerns.

What students said

“ .”
23710
“Lectures were dry PowerPoints read verbatim.”
23710

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exam evidence is limited, but exams before the date, making assessment more manageable.

Quiz ReviewTest ReviewExam ReviewUnclear Online Labs

Assessment risk

Standard

70/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and exams being reviewed before the date, but do not clearly prove open-book, closed-book, or proctoring rules.

Quiz ReviewTest ReviewExam Review
“She always goes over the before the date.”
23710

Online

The online review mentions labs and homework packets but does not clearly prove exam format, proctoring, .

Unclear LabsHomework Packets
“ .”
23710
“ , and class disorganized.”
23710

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She's an excellent teacher. and very easy.”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, grade ease, assessment, and format contrast; credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

84/100

“Amazing and fun professor, and very interesting too!”

👍 Recommendation Rate

86/100

“ !”

📉 Format Risk

58/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She gives amazing real-life case scenarios and as she should.
  • She's an excellent teacher.
  • Lectures were dry PowerPoints read verbatim.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • and very easy.
  • this was my first in person class at COS and she was easy and relaxed teacher.

Theme 3

🧭 About Format Difference

  • .
  • She always goes over the before the date.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

58/100

Evidence confidence

Only 4 reviews are available, and the single online review conflicts sharply with the positive in-person reviews.

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

237104 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

4 reported outcomes

A range

3

A 3

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values