AI Rate Professor

English

Alisa Lieberman

Courses not reported · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
45/100
RMP rating
3.0/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
2.8

The decision

Take her if you value thought-provoking readings, but if and responsive feedback.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerInteresting readingsInspirational perspectiveHarsh grading riskUnclear assignmentsHeavy writing
  • and a fresh perspective on life.
  • Negative reviews warn , and many papers.
  • Online and , so the experience appears highly dependent on grading tolerance and student expectations.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

42/100

A grades are possible, but , and many papers make the A feel unreliable.

Online evidence includes harsh grading complaints, while and a withdrawal with workload concerns.

Is the course easy?

Standard

50/100

The ideas and readings are engaging, but writing demands and .

Both online and and difficulty complaints.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Participation is mentioned, but reviews do not clearly .

Neither online .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

50/100

Students recommend her for interesting perspectives but and communication matter most.

Both formats are split, with one positive and one negative review in each format.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

30/100

One , and an in-person review tags her as a tough grader.

Format shift

Online evidence gives the clearest harsh-grading complaint, while .

Workload

Heavy

35/100

, and so many papers, though positive students found the material interesting.

Format shift

Online reviews mention reading and essays, while and papers.

Teaching experience

Average

52/100

She can be inspiring through readings and perspective, but and poor email response lower the teaching experience.

Format shift

Online reviews are sharply split, and and difficulty concerns.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

20/100

, and grading rather than exams.

Format shift

Both formats emphasize writing and .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews are also split, with one student praising the readings and , and many papers.

Main concern

In-person workload and .

What students said

“ and offers a different way of looking at things.”
28254
“ ”
28254

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

Online reviews are split between an inspiring reading-focused class and a , and no email response.

Main concern

and .

What students said

“Reading and .”
28254
“ no explanation.”
28254

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove an exam policy, and the , and papers.

Reviews do not clearly prove exam formatReading and essaysAssignments and papers

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, proctoring, open-book rules, webcam use, or .

Reviews do not clearly prove exam formatReading materialSo many papers
“ ”
28254
“So many papers”
28254

Online

Online reviews do not clearly prove exam policy, proctoring, open-book rules, webcam use, or .

Reviews do not clearly prove exam formatReading and essaysAssignments
“Reading and .”
28254
“ ”
28254

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ no explanation, she never gave out 100% even on small assignments.”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and communication. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

52/100

“She gives you a whole different way of looking at the world.”

👍 Recommendation Split

50/100

“ .”

⚖️

30/100

“ ”

Theme 1

📚 About Course Content

  • Reading and .
  • and offers a different way of looking at things.

Theme 2

⚖️

  • no explanation
  • she never gave out 100% even on small assignments.

Theme 3

📨 About Support

  • I emailed her back twice and got no response.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

55/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is medium because the 4 recent reviews are format-balanced but too few and sharply polarized.

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 52

Course coverage

282544 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

4 reported outcomes

A range

2

A- 2

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Drop/Withdrawal 1