AI Rate Professor

Culinary Arts

Kyran Wiley

NUTR20 · NUTR020 · 6 lifetime ratings

AI rating
100/100
RMP rating
5.0/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
1.5

The decision

Wiley is a , hands-on class with and low stress.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyClear GradingEngaging ChefCaringFun ClassEasy Pass
  • Every review is highly positive and .
  • Students , and strong communication.
  • The course feels easy and enjoyable for students who participate.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

WalkInThePark

94/100

Grades are very high, and students say the course is not difficult to pass if they participate and communicate.

because there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Introductory

90/100

Students describe the material as easy, fun, practical, and .

because there are no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

60/100

Reviews do not clearly state an , but the hands-on kitchen format likely rewards participation.

In-person reviews mention engagement and making food, while there is no online evidence.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

100/100

Every student review is highly positive and praises his clarity, humor, fairness, and support.

All because there are no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Generous

92/100

Students report , and mostly A or A+ outcomes.

Format shift

.

Workload

Light

88/100

Students describe a simple workload with food-making, tests, and only a few main research topics.

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Excellent

98/100

Students consistently praise his humor, feedback, demonstrations, engagement, and care.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Reviews mention tests, research topics, demonstrations, kitchen work, and .

Format shift

All .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

6 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In-person reviews describe a and strong demonstrations.

Main concern

There are few concerns beyond needing to engage with class activities.

What students said

“He lays out his grading criteria from day one, giving clear instructions on what he expects from you.”
NUTR020
“Nothing to hard”
NUTR20

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention taking tests but do not clearly prove .

Tests MentionedFew Graded Items

Assessment risk

Standard

65/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

but do not clearly prove whether they are open-book, closed-book, proctored, or practical exams.

Tests Mentioned
“super easy make food and .”
NUTR20

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“By far one of !”

Voice snapshots generated from 6 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and support. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

98/100

“I learned a lot from his demonstrations, and .”

👍 Recommendation Rate

100/100

“Funny Guy 10/10 would take again”

⚖️

92/100

“He lays out his grading criteria from day one, giving clear instructions on what he expects from you.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Chef Wiley is a great professor and an even greater chef.
  • Wiley has a good sense of humor and engages students.
  • Great teacher!!!

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • the course is not difficult to pass at all.
  • Nothing to hard
  • He sticks to his syllabus but the course is not difficult to pass at all.

Theme 3

❤️ About Support

  • He's easy get in contact with as well as understanding.
  • he is willing to work with and your situation so long as you communicate with him.
  • !

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

6

Recent reviews read by the AI

6

Lifetime ratings

74/100

Evidence confidence

Six consistent reviews are very positive and detailed enough, but the sample size is small and all reviews are in person.

Inside 6 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 56
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

NUTR0204 reviews
NUTR202 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

6 reported outcomes

A range

5

A+ 3 · A 2

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values