AI Rate Professor

Psychology

Casie Ennis

PSYC080 · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating
56/100
RMP rating
4.0/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
2.0

The decision

She may be a kind and flexible instructor, but the evidence is .

Best fit · Beginner FriendlySweetUnderstandingSlow Email RepliesFlexible Attendance
  • The only review describes her as sweet and understanding about missed class.
  • The .
  • Evidence is very limited, with only one in-person review and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

The only reported grade is B+, and the review does not describe the class as an easy A.

All because there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

65/100

The low difficulty rating suggests manageable content, but the comment gives little detail about course challenge.

Only one in-person review informs course easiness.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

78/100

The review specifically says she is understanding about missing class.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

45/100

The review is positive about her personality but gives no direct recommendation and notes slow communication.

Recommendation evidence .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

55/100

One B+ grade and no grading comments suggest average grading with insufficient evidence for leniency.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

60/100

The difficulty rating is low, but the review does not clearly describe workload.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Good

76/100

The review describes her as sweet and understanding, but .

Format shift

.

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

The review does not clearly identify whether the class depends more on exams or assignments.

Format shift

and it does not describe assessments.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

The single in-person review is mildly positive and highlights kindness and .

Main concern

.

What students said

“She is very sweet and understanding of missing class”
PSYC080

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove exam format, proctoring, open-book rules, or .

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

The or .

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She is very sweet and understanding of missing class, but and stuff like that.”

Voice snapshots generated from 1 review, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: Low.

❤️ Instructor Support

76/100

“She is very sweet and understanding of missing class”

⚠️ Communication Speed

45/100

“ and stuff like that.”

Theme 1

❤️ About Character

  • She is very sweet and understanding of missing class
  • and stuff like that.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

1

Recent reviews read by the AI

1

Lifetime ratings

25/100

Evidence confidence

Only , so confidence is limited.

Inside 1 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

PSYC0801 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values