AI Rate Professor

Biology

John Sheetz

BIOL20 · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
86/100
RMP rating
4.0/5
Take again
75%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

if you want a fair, structured biology class with and can tolerate lecture-heavy meetings.

Best fit · Effort For RewardClear exam targetsOpen-note assessmentsKind and communicativeLecture heavyParticipation-based labs
  • Exams and quizzes are predictable because learning objectives and notes are central to the assessments.
  • Grades look , and clear expectations.
  • The main drawbacks are lecture-heavy classes, occasional disorganization, and rushed quizzes.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

86/100

An A is very realistic because assessments are predictable, notes are allowed, and .

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

74/100

The course content is manageable and formulaic, though lectures can be heavy and .

All course-easiness evidence comes from in-person Biol20 reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

35/100

because students mention and participation-based labs.

, and they point to required class participation.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

78/100

Students mostly recommend him for , and reachable support despite some organization issues.

Recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

82/100

because labs are participation based and students report A grades with .

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

62/100

The workload is not described as overwhelming, but daily quizzes, lectures, labs, and .

Format shift

Workload .

Teaching experience

Good

78/100

Students describe him as , and engaging, but also note late starts and occasional disorganization.

Format shift

Teaching-quality .

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

, and labs rather than relying only on exams or assignments.

Format shift

Assessment .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

and predictable biology course with open-note assessments, participation-based labs, and some lecture-heavy or .

Main concern

Students mention late starts, rushed quizzes, heavy lectures, and .

What students said

“We were able to use open hand written notes for quizzes and tests.”
Biol20
“ and decently fun.”
Biol20
“class was easy, predictable, and formulaic.”
Biol20

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

The exam setup is student-friendly because reviews explicitly say handwritten notes are allowed and .

Open Handwritten NotesLearning Objectives on ExamsAttendance QuizzesPredictable Exams

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

88/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews clearly support open handwritten notes on quizzes and .

Open Handwritten NotesLearning Objectives on ExamsAttendance Quizzes
“those learning objections were on the exams.”
Biol20
“notes and exams.”
Biol20

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“class was easy, predictable, and formulaic.”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, exams, and grading. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

78/100

“ and open atmosphere!”

📝

88/100

“notes and exams.”

⚖️

82/100

“ and decently fun.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Professor is very kind and intelligent, able to be reached outside of class and is very communicative about class things.
  • and open atmosphere!
  • and he's cool.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • class was easy, predictable, and formulaic.
  • Few things in and decently fun.
  • , but questions are super specific.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

74/100

Evidence confidence

and detailed, but the sample is small and has no online evidence.

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 51
3 out of 52
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

Biol204 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

3

A+ 1 · A 2

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values