AI Rate Professor

Art

Dan Heskamp

ART001 · ART23 · ART27400 · ART006 · ART21414 · ART8 · ART6 · ART01 · ART7 · 14 lifetime ratings

AI rating
100/100
RMP rating
4.6/5
Take again
92.86%
Difficulty
2.2

The decision

if you want a and a very high chance of a good grade.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyGreat FeedbackCaringLenient GradingMotivationalRelaxed Class
  • , and supportive teaching style.
  • Grades are very attainable because he allows revisions, , and .
  • The , and staying current with deadlines.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

WalkInThePark

92/100

Getting an A appears very attainable because students mention , and many reported A-range grades.

Online evidence shows easy A-range outcomes with some reading, while in-person evidence adds stronger proof through resubmissions and .

Is the course easy?

Introductory

84/100

The course content is generally easy and beginner-friendly, though students must keep up with deadlines and .

Online reviews mention more reading than expected, while and relaxed studio work.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

55/100

Participation matters appears often, but reviews do .

Both formats provide limited attendance-policy evidence, with as important.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

94/100

Students overwhelmingly recommend him because , and .

Both online and in-person review clearly negative.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Generous

91/100

Grading is very forgiving because students , and chances to redo work.

Format shift

In-person reviews provide the strongest grading evidence through resubmissions and , while and A-range outcomes.

Workload

Light

78/100

Workload is usually light, with simple assignments and limited work, though some reading, supplies, and deadlines still matter.

Format shift

Online reviews mention more reading, while and fewer tasks.

Teaching experience

Excellent

94/100

Students repeatedly describe him as kind, helpful, motivational, and strong .

Format shift

Both formats strongly support excellent teaching, with online reviews stressing support and in-person reviews stressing demonstrations and classroom environment.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

18/100

Assessment appears centered on art projects, assignments, participation, revisions, and .

Format shift

Both formats point toward assignment-based evaluation, with .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

10 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

and relaxed environment, with added evidence of revisions, , and low assignment load.

Main concern

Students need to keep up with due dates and may need to buy supplies.

What students said

“The class itself is really easy so long as youre keeping up with due dates, and he lets you resubmit work for a higher grade.”
ART6
“Make sure you don't fall behind because it's hard to catch up you need to buy your own art supplies”
ART006

Remote format

Online

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

Online reviews are highly , and a manageable class with some reading.

Main concern

Some online students found the reading heavier than expected for an art class.

What students said

“loved this instructor !! probs one of my favs so far. , so kind !”
ART001
“Great teacher! Was a but still was a good class.”
ART01

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove exam format, proctoring, open-book status, or .

Exam policy not clearly proven

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, proctoring, quiz format, midterm format, or final format.

Online

Online reviews do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, Lockdown Browser, open-book, quiz, midterm, or .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Mr. Heskamp is the . and is super nice.”

Voice snapshots generated from 14 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and concerns; credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

94/100

“ and .”

👍 Recommendation Rate

94/100

“ .”

⚖️

91/100

“he lets you resubmit work for a higher grade.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Excellent teacher with great instruction, atmosphere, and vibes.
  • He was an amazing art teacher and .
  • Dan is an excellent teacher.

Theme 2

📈 About Grades and Workload

  • they want to give you the and is very lenient.
  • The class didn't have a lot of assignments and when there were they were very simple to do.
  • and allows students to fix their mistakes and resubmit their pieces.

Theme 3

⚠️ About Concerns

  • Great teacher! Was a but still was a good class.
  • Make sure you don't fall behind because it's hard to catch up you need to buy your own art supplies
  • Overall unprofessional, and a little bit loose.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

14

Recent reviews read by the AI

14

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is high because 14 reviews span several years, include both formats, and show a consistent positive pattern with and teaching details.

Inside 14 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 510
4 out of 53
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ART0014 reviews
ART0062 reviews
ART72 reviews
ART011 review
ART214141 review
Show 4 more courses
ART231 review
ART274001 review
ART61 review
ART81 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

12 reported outcomes

A range

8

A+ 3 · A 2 · A- 3

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Not sure yet 2