AI Rate Professor

Theater

Nick Terry

DRAM015 · DRAM13 · DRAM24905 · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
59/100
RMP rating
4.0/5
Take again
66.67%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

Nick Terry may be worthwhile for students who want a , but the limited and mixed evidence makes him a cautious pick.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerCaringPatient and clearMixed teaching depthParticipation mattersLimited recent evidence
  • Older reviews are very positive about his patience, clarity, and care for students.
  • The newest review is strongly negative and says the class lacked depth and value.
  • but not fully reliable.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

Grades are mixed but include two A grades, and comments do not prove either an easy A or .

because there are zero online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Standard

50/100

The content appears moderate, but one student says the class lacked depth while another had a C grade.

Only in-person comments exist, and they conflict on whether the learning experience feels meaningful.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

55/100

Participation matters appears in one review, but comments do not clearly describe a .

online evidence available.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

64/100

Two students strongly liked him, but the newest review is negative enough to lower confidence and enthusiasm.

Recommendation evidence is entirely in person, with older positive reviews offset by a recent negative one.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

55/100

The small grade sample includes two A grades and one C, with .

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

55/100

Reviews do not describe workload in detail, so the safest read is moderate rather than clearly light or heavy.

Format shift

Only in-person workload evidence exists.

Teaching experience

Average

65/100

Students praise his care and clarity, but the newest review criticizes his methods and lack of depth.

Format shift

Only in-person teaching evidence exists, and the recent negative review meaningfully reduces the score.

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

The reviews do not clearly identify whether grades depend .

Format shift

Only in-person assessment evidence exists, and it is too vague for a strong classification.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

older reviews and one recent negative review about shallow teaching.

Main concern

The newest student felt the class did not go deep enough and .

What students said

“I didn't like his teaching methods, and I couldn't switch due to schedule conflicts.”
DRAM015
“Really does a nice job and wants to see his student's learn and succeed.”
DRAM24905
“ and clear.”
DRAM13

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove the structure.

Exam Policy Not Clear

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, proctoring rules, open-book policy, or final structure.

Exam Policy Not Clear

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Nick is one of . He's awesome, he really cares about his students and his craft, and and clear.”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 reviews, highlighting the split between older praise and a recent negative experience; credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

65/100

“ and clear.”

👍 Recommendation Level

64/100

“Really does a nice job and wants to see his student's learn and succeed.”

⚠️ Recent Concern

38/100

“I paid for this class just to learn nothing from it.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • I didn't like his teaching methods, and I couldn't switch due to schedule conflicts.
  • and clear.

Theme 2

❤️ About Student Support

  • Really does a nice job and wants to see his student's learn and succeed.
  • he really cares about his students and his craft

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

38/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is low because there are only three reviews, two are from 2017, and the newest review sharply conflicts with them.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

DRAM0151 review
DRAM131 review
DRAM249051 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

2

A 2

B range

0

No reported values

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values