AI Rate Professor

English

Emily Vaughn

ENG1 · ENGL0000 · ENG001 · ENG01 · ENGL251 · ENGLI251 · ENGL002 · ENGLISH001 · ENGLISH1 · ENGL010 · ENG251 · ENGL001 · 30 lifetime ratings

AI rating
99/100
RMP rating
4.5/5
Take again
78.95%
Difficulty
2.1

The decision

if you want a usually rewarded with a strong grade.

Best fit · Effort For RewardHelpful feedbackLenient deadlinesEasy English classCaringLots of writing
  • Most , and willingness to help.
  • Grades are usually easy to earn if , and readings.
  • Some students find lectures boring or report isolated issues with rudeness, plagiarism handling, or canceled classes.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

88/100

Students usually earn high grades through manageable essays, late-work flexibility, resubmissions, and rather than no effort.

Online and , while in-person reviews add stronger evidence for resubmissions and late work.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

78/100

The course is generally easy and beginner-friendly, but students still , and revisions.

Both formats are described as easy, though easier than online.

Is attendance flexible?

Optional

86/100

, and several comments emphasize late-work flexibility rather than strict presence rules.

Clear attendance flexibility evidence comes from in-person reviews; .

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

89/100

Most students recommend her because she is helpful, clear, flexible, and .

Both formats are mostly positive, but lectures, canceled classes, and fairness.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Generous

90/100

Students report , and mostly A-range outcomes.

Format shift

and , while in-person reviews add strong evidence for rewrites and late work.

Workload

Moderate

68/100

The workload is manageable but , and smaller assignments.

Format shift

Online reviews often mention 10 journals and essays, while of reading or homework.

Teaching experience

Excellent

90/100

, and caring attitude, with a small set of complaints about boredom or unfairness.

Format shift

Online reviews are especially positive about responsiveness and feedback, while and more mixed.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

18/100

Assessment is dominated , and writing assignments rather than exams.

Format shift

Both formats consistently describe writing assignments as the main assessment method.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

23 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person students mostly describe an , and a predictable writing load.

Main concern

The main concerns are occasional boring lectures, canceled classes, and one serious negative plagiarism dispute.

What students said

“If you are looking for an ”
ENG001
“While will have a much easier time passing the class if you go in person compared to online.”
ENGL001
“ until the end of the semester.”
ENGL002

Remote format

Online

7 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online students usually praise quick , and manageable writing work.

Main concern

The main concern is that some online students found the lectures boring or did not learn much.

What students said

“She responds to emails very quickly. and pushes .”
ENGL002
“Prof. Vaughn's class was super easy and she was very flexible with her assignments.”
ENGL002
“Her class was okay. We had to write 4 essays and 10 journals in total.”
ENG001

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews , and assessment appears mainly writing-based.

Exam policy not clearly provenWriting assignments dominate

Assessment risk

Varies

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, proctoring, open-book policy, or , though one old review mentions a quiz.

Exam policy not clearly provenWriting assignments dominateQuiz mentioned once
“Class had minimal homework, 4 essay (which you could always redo to get higher grade), and a quiz.”
ENGLISH1
“We had to write 4 essays, 10 journals, and several small writing assignments in total, plus read a whole book and a whole textbook.”
ENGL002

Online

Online reviews do not clearly prove exam format, webcam rules, proctoring, open-book policy, or .

Exam policy not clearly provenWriting assignments dominate
“We had to write 4 essays and 10 journals in total.”
ENG001
“There is four essays, but plenty of time and .”
ENGL001

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“P. Vaughn was very fair and . She gives you plenty of time and . You won't regret taking her, literally do the work and you will pass.”

Voice snapshots generated from 30 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

90/100

“ and pushes .”

⚖️

90/100

“ until the end of the semester.”

📚 Workload Reality

68/100

“We had to write 4 essays, 10 journals, and several small writing assignments in total, plus read a whole book and a whole textbook.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • and pushes .
  • and will assist whenever you need it.
  • and shows great interest for her students to improve in the class.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • If you are looking for an
  • until the end of the semester.
  • Plenty of as well, don't pass up on her.

Theme 3

📝 About Workload

  • Had to write 10 journals and 3 essays for this class, but they weren't as intimidating as I thought they were.
  • The work isn't but a lot of time to improve and fix.
  • Get ready to do work though, as long as you keep up with your work and go to class itll be easy.

Theme 4

⚠️ About Concerns

  • and goes over material most people should already know, makes going to her class hard at times because it's very boring.
  • She did cancel class a lot.
  • She is rude and unfair, she accused me of plagiarism when I did not plagiarize and immediately gave me and F.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

30

Recent reviews read by the AI

30

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

Thirty reviews across many years and both formats show a strong, mostly consistent pattern with enough detail to trust the main findings.

Inside 30 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 524
4 out of 52
3 out of 50
2 out of 53
1 out of 51

Course coverage

ENG0018 reviews
ENGL0026 reviews
ENGL0014 reviews
ENG2513 reviews
ENG12 reviews
Show 7 more courses
ENG011 review
ENGL00001 review
ENGL0101 review
ENGL2511 review
ENGLI2511 review
ENGLISH0011 review
ENGLISH11 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

19 reported outcomes

A range

15

A+ 8 · A 6 · A- 1

B range

2

B+ 1 · B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1