AI Rate Professor

English

Robert Grundbrecher

ENG1A · ENG1 · ENGLISH1 · ENG251 · ENGL001 · 20 lifetime ratings

AI rating
100/100
RMP rating
4.8/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
1.6

The decision

Take him if you want a and a very realistic path to an A.

Best fit · Easy A HunterEssay revisionsClear feedbackEasy ACaring teacherSimple workload
  • Students repeatedly say essay revisions make high grades very attainable.
  • , and genuine care for student improvement.
  • The course is essay-focused and usually light, though some students find lectures long or .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

WalkInThePark

96/100

Getting an A is very easy because , and fair grading let students raise scores if they try.

The Easy A evidence comes almost entirely from in-person reviews, while the one online review only says the .

Is the course easy?

Introductory

88/100

The course content is usually described as , and an easy final rather than intellectually demanding material.

In-person comments provide the real course-easiness evidence, and the online review is too brief to judge content difficulty.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

78/100

as , but another warns that missing too many classes can hurt the grade.

Attendance comments appear only in .

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

98/100

Students overwhelmingly recommend him because , and gives students .

Both formats are positive, but the strong recommendation evidence is from the .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Generous

97/100

because many reviews say students can revise essays until they earn much higher scores.

Format shift

The grading-leniency evidence is almost entirely in-person, while the .

Workload

Light

86/100

The , and peer review, with repeated claims that papers are not long or hard.

Format shift

In-person reviews describe the workload as light, while the online review gives no workload detail.

Teaching experience

Excellent

96/100

Students consistently describe him as , and strong at teaching writing through feedback.

Format shift

The in-person evidence is detailed and highly positive, while the online evidence is positive but minimal.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

18/100

, and peer review, with only limited mention of a final exam.

Format shift

, while the online review does not clarify assessment methods.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

20 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter

In-person reviews strongly describe an easy, revision-friendly writing class with and caring teaching.

Main concern

Lectures and peer review can feel long or less useful to some students.

What students said

“He lets you resubmit essays until you get 100%”
ENGL001
“Allows for revisions so its very simple to get in A in his class.”
ENG1

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

The single online review is positive but too brief to prove much beyond general recommendation.

Main concern

The online evidence is very limited.

What students said

“ ”
ENGL001

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exam evidence is limited, but the book Night, making exam risk low.

Easy FinalBook Review FinalEssay Revision Focus

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

83/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

the book Night, but do not clearly prove proctoring or closed-book policy.

Easy FinalBook Review Final
“the book”
ENGL001
“ '”
ENG1

Online

The online review does .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“He lets you resubmit essays until you get 100%, and I am so unbelievably grateful for that!”

Voice snapshots generated from 21 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format evidence. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

96/100

“He truly wanted his students to learn and improve.”

📈 Easy A Path

96/100

“ if you try.”

⚖️

97/100

“He gives as many chances as you want to revise the essays.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • so well and genuinely cares about making sure you are understanding what you are doing.
  • and direct with what he expects.
  • He really dose teach you how to write and .

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Really good instructor and it's an easy A
  • You will get a great grade in this class if you follow his instructions.
  • Allows for revisions so its very simple to get in A in his class.

Theme 3

📝 About Assignments

  • .
  • Be ready for tons of peer editing.
  • The only thing focused on in this class is writing the essays.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

21

Recent reviews read by the AI

20

Lifetime ratings

93/100

Evidence confidence

The rating is highly credible because 21 reviews across many years are detailed and , and .

Inside 21 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 518
4 out of 52
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ENGL0018 reviews
ENG17 reviews
ENG1A2 reviews
ENG2512 reviews
ENGLISH12 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

17 reported outcomes

A range

14

A+ 6 · A 7 · A- 1

B range

3

B+ 2 · B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values