AI Rate Professor

Philosophy

Ulrike Willwerth

PHIL005 · PHIL5 · 7 lifetime ratings

AI rating
61/100
RMP rating
3.7/5
Take again
57.14%
Difficulty
3.6

The decision

if you will attend, participate, read, and write carefully, but if you want a low-effort philosophy class.

Best fit · Effort For RewardParticipation RequiredTough PapersStrict GradingKind PersonalityReading Heavy
  • Students often describe Willwerth as sweet, passionate, and knowledgeable, but not always easy to understand.
  • Grades , and following directions closely.
  • She can be flexible with missed work in some cases, but and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

An A is possible, but students , and accept strict grading.

because there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

The philosophy content is interesting but can become hard and long discussions.

All course .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

24/100

Attendance and participation are repeatedly described as required, even though .

.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

57/100

, but hesitate because the class is long, writing-heavy, and strictly graded.

All recommendation evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

38/100

She is kind but particular, and students say not to expect .

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

46/100

Work includes reading, Cornell notes, papers, in-class assignments, participation, and .

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Good

68/100

Students find her sweet, passionate, and knowledgeable, but some say she is hard to understand or .

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

24/100

Grades appear , and in-class work than exams.

Format shift

All .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

7 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews describe a discussion-heavy philosophy class with , and strict but sometimes flexible grading.

Main concern

Students may struggle with long class meetings, paper grading, and .

What students said

“Participation, book and at least once.”
PHIL005
“Don't expect full scores.”
PHIL005

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention missed quizzes but do not clearly prove exam format, proctoring, open-book rules, midterm rules, or .

Missed QuizzesNo Clear Exam Policy

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

but do not clearly prove exam format, open-book status, or .

Missed Quizzes
“Just come to class and participate in the discussions.”
PHIL005
“flexible and accommodating with homeworks and missed quizzes.”
PHIL005

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Participation, book and at least once.”

Voice snapshots generated from 7 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and attendance; credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

68/100

“She is a very pleasant teacher with a lot of wisdom and knowledge to offer.”

⚖️

38/100

“Don't expect full scores.”

📚 Workload And Attendance

46/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • she is an ok teacher and very sweet.
  • She is a lovely professor but she's definitely particular with .
  • The professor is brilliant and very sweet, however, she will not make exceptions or sugarcoat your scores.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • This class seemed easy at first but when it came to writing the and my grade suffered a bit.
  • .
  • and work asked just as and you will be ok.

Theme 3

🗣️ About Participation

  • Just come to class and participate in the discussions.
  • Participation, book and at least once.
  • She will make you stay the whole class meeting

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

7

Recent reviews read by the AI

7

Lifetime ratings

66/100

Evidence confidence

but limited evidence, with mixed opinions and no online data.

Inside 7 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 51
3 out of 52
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

PHIL0056 reviews
PHIL51 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

7 reported outcomes

A range

2

A 2

B range

5

B+ 3 · B 2

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values