AI Rate Professor

English

Andrea Hawkins

ENG02 · ENG001 · ENG01 · ENGL002 · ENG002 · 13 lifetime ratings

AI rating
82/100
RMP rating
4.0/5
Take again
61.54%
Difficulty
3.4

The decision

Take Hawkins if and and essay work.

Best fit · Effort For RewardSupportive FeedbackCaring ProfessorWriting HeavyTough GradingExtra Credit
  • Students consistently describe Hawkins as caring, helpful, and willing to work with deadlines.
  • ENG001 feels much easier than ENGL002, , and heavy writing.
  • can make strong grades possible, but several students still call her a .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

70/100

An A is realistic with effort and , but the writing load and .

Online evidence mentions expected writing, while ENGL002 work.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

65/100

ENG001 is often described as easy and familiar, but ENGL002 becomes harder because of and reading.

The single online review describes a writing-heavy short course, while in-person reviews split between easy ENG001 and demanding ENGL002.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

55/100

Reviews do not clearly prove a , though participation appears to matter in some classes.

Neither online , so the evidence is limited.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

78/100

and feedback, but workload-heavy ENGL002 reviews create real hesitation.

The online review is strongly positive, while but divided by course workload.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

42/100

Students mention , but and support make high grades possible.

Format shift

The tough-grading evidence comes from in-person ENGL002 reviews; the online .

Workload

Heavy

30/100

Several ENGL002 students report many readings, weekly responses, presentations, and long essays.

Format shift

Online work is described as lots of writing in four weeks, while in-person workload ranges from easy ENG001 to heavy ENGL002.

Teaching experience

Good

82/100

Students repeatedly call her helpful, understanding, caring, and strong with .

Format shift

Both formats praise her support, but .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

20/100

Reviews emphasize essays, readings, reflections, presentations, homework, and .

Format shift

Both formats point toward writing assignments, with .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

12 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews praise her care and feedback, but ENGL002 students , and .

Main concern

Writing-heavy courses can require a lot of work and may not suit students who dislike essays.

What students said

“Nice professor but lots of work.”
ENGL002
“she will not let you fail”
ENG001

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

The online review is very positive but notes a lot of writing in a short four-week course.

Main concern

The online workload may feel intense because of the compressed course length.

What students said

“Lots of writing but that was expected for a four week course.”
ENG002

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews focus on writing assignments and do not clearly prove exam format, proctoring, open-book rules, or .

Reviews Do Not Clearly Prove Exam Policy

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and homework but do not clearly prove exam policy.

Writing Assignments EmphasizedReviews Do Not Clearly Prove Exam Policy
“One presentation & 3 essays.”
ENGL002

Online

The online review does not clearly prove exam format, proctoring, open-book rules, or .

Reviews Do Not Clearly Prove Exam Policy

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Seriously one of the . She's so understanding and she always know how to make a lecture fun.”

Voice snapshots generated from 13 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences; credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

82/100

“Really helpful and need some extra time on.”

📚 Workload Reality

30/100

“She requires a lot of work!”

⚖️

42/100

“ as well!!!”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • and caring.
  • Very helpful professor. Always helps when needed.
  • Gives good important lectures.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • The class is a lot of work and sometimes it's hard to keep up
  • I shockingly passed her class with an A but lots of ppl dropped her class.
  • Most of the criteria I knew already so class was easy.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

13

Recent reviews read by the AI

13

Lifetime ratings

85/100

Evidence confidence

Thirteen reviews across several years give , and grading tradeoffs.

Inside 13 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 57
4 out of 50
3 out of 55
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ENG0015 reviews
ENGL0025 reviews
ENG0021 review
ENG011 review
ENG021 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

6 reported outcomes

A range

4

A 4

B range

2

B+ 1 · B- 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values