AI Rate Professor

Economics

Walter Kasun

ECON040ECON050 · ECON050 · ECON50 · ECON40 · 12 lifetime ratings

AI rating
58/100
RMP rating
3.3/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
2.9

The decision

Take Kasun if you can tolerate long lectures and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProLots of HomeworkLecture HeavyMixed SupportClear CriteriaTest Heavy
  • Students are sharply split between calling him a great economics instructor and describing him as rude or disengaged.
  • Grades can be manageable because , and .
  • The main downside , and inconsistent student support.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

72/100

Many students earned A grades and , but and homework still require steady effort.

There are no online reviews, so all Easy A .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

62/100

Economics content is often presented straightforwardly, though long lectures and .

Only in-person evidence exists, and it shows straightforward material with lecture fatigue.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

65/100

as not strictly graded, but students warn that and performance.

All attendance evidence is in person, including conflicting comments that but still important.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

50/100

Recommendations are split because some students value the while others strongly criticize his attitude and lecture style.

There are no online reviews, so the mixed recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

55/100

Grades , and multiple-choice exams, but some students report and hard finals.

Format shift

and tough-final comments.

Workload

Heavy

35/100

Reviews repeatedly , and long class sessions.

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Average

58/100

Some students praise his knowledge and explanations, but others describe him as rude, boring, or unsupportive.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews exist, and they are highly divided.

Assessment method

Balanced

65/100

, and a final, with exams carrying meaningful weight.

Format shift

All .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

12 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

All evidence is in person, with manageable grades but mixed teaching quality and repeated complaints about long lectures and homework.

Main concern

Students may need to self-manage because support and lecture quality are inconsistent.

What students said

“ .”
ECON050
“Lectures are dreadfully boring.”
ECON40

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams seem mostly standard multiple-choice midterms and and others warning the .

Multiple Choice TestsTwo MidtermsFinal ExamReview Packet

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and a final, but do not clearly prove open-book rules or proctoring details.

Multiple Choice TestsTwo MidtermsFinal ExamReview Packet
“ .”
ECON40
“Midterms and if you study the review packet he gives you.”
ECON50

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Pretty . Don't expect much support.”

Voice snapshots generated from 12 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and recommendation split; credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

58/100

“He was great with questions as he would elaborate on a question even if it were minimal.”

📚 Workload Load

35/100

“be prepared to have homework that is like 50 questions.”

👍 Recommendation Split

50/100

“ !!!!”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • This professor is great at what he teaches
  • Very very very slow lecture talks abt the same thing over and over and then yaps
  • This man is a great teacher

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • .
  • Do the .
  • 80q every week.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

12

Recent reviews read by the AI

12

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

, though opinions are inconsistent.

Inside 12 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 54
4 out of 53
3 out of 51
2 out of 51
1 out of 53

Course coverage

ECON407 reviews
ECON040ECON0503 reviews
ECON0501 review
ECON501 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

11 reported outcomes

A range

8

A+ 1 · A 7

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Incomplete 1