AI Rate Professor

English

Charles Parker

ENG2 · ENG1 · ENGL018 · ENG001 · ENG01 · ENGLISH251 · ENGLISH2 · ENGL002 · ENG1251 · ENGLISH1 · ENG4 · ENG251 · ENGL001 · 83 lifetime ratings

AI rating
61/100
RMP rating
4.1/5
Take again
62.79%
Difficulty
2.7

The decision

if you like discussion and , but be cautious online or if being called on makes you uncomfortable.

Best fit · Effort For RewardDiscussion heavyParticipation requiredCaring but bluntTough essay graderOnline anxiety risk
  • In-person students often praise him as caring, funny, and effective when students participate.
  • Online reviews are much more negative, especially about unclear instructions, cameras, group work, and anxiety from being called on.
  • Grades can be good, but , and readings require real effort.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

60/100

Good grades are common, but students say they , and steady effort.

In-person reviews often say effort can earn an A, while and more frustration.

Is the course easy?

Standard

52/100

The content is manageable but , and participation make it more than a casual English class.

and more engaging, while online classes are reported as confusing and more stressful.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

20/100

Attendance and participation are repeatedly described as important, with students saying you must show up and be ready to speak.

Both formats show low flexibility, with online reviews specifically mentioning cameras and being called on.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

64/100

, but online and introverted students report serious concerns.

In-person recommendation is much stronger than online recommendation.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

45/100

He can be fair and allow revisions, but many students and little .

Format shift

Online reviews skew stricter, while as fair if students participate and revise.

Workload

Moderate

45/100

, and group projects, with some students calling the workload heavy.

Format shift

Online reviews mention lots of homework and group projects more negatively, while as manageable.

Teaching experience

Good

74/100

He is often praised as caring, funny, and discussion-driven, but his blunt style and online communication hurt the experience for some students.

Format shift

Teaching experience is much stronger in person, while online reviews repeatedly cite anxiety and .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

30/100

Reviews emphasize essays, readings, participation, discussions, group projects, and revisions more than exams.

Format shift

Both formats are assignment and participation heavy, though .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

37 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are generally stronger, with many students praising his discussions, care, humor, and .

Main concern

Students must participate, attend, read, and .

What students said

“Participate in discussion and you will get an A.”
ENG001
“He truly cares for his students, and .”
ENG01
“Professor "P" is a good teacher, but is really a perfectionist on the .”
ENG001

Remote format

Online

13 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

Online reviews are mostly negative, citing unclear communication, tough grading, required cameras, group work, and anxiety during Zoom meetings.

Main concern

Online students often feel pressured by cameras, participation, and .

What students said

“He requires cameras on, calls you out on everything, is a big group work fan, and is very blunt so it can come off as rude.”
ENG001
“ .”
ENG2
“This class honestly gave me major anxiety.”
ENG001

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exam evidence is limited and mixed, with comments mentioning tests and finals but , and group presentations.

Cameras Required OnlineGroup PresentationsTests MentionedReviews do not clearly prove proctoring policy

Assessment risk

Varies

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and one test, but do not clearly prove closed-book rules, proctoring, or a .

Easy Final MentionedOne Test MentionedReviews do not clearly prove proctoring policy
“ if you did your research.”
ENG001
“He !”
ENGLISH2

Online

Online reviews explicitly mention cameras, group presentations, and tests, but do not clearly prove proctoring software, open-book rules, or .

Cameras Required OnlineGroup PresentationsTests MentionedReviews do not clearly prove proctoring policy
“cameras must be on the whole time.”
ENGL002
“Cameras need to be on and there are group projects.”
ENG001
“Gave books you need to read for ”
ENG4

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If you don't care for learning and want an easy A, .”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

74/100

“ . Really engaging and makes you feel as if he really cares about your success.”

⚖️

45/100

“He's definitely a but he's hilarious and his class was very interesting.”

👍 Recommendation Fit

64/100

“ if you want to learn, but if participation anxiety is a major issue.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • His lectures are awesome, lots of .
  • He answers all of your questions and .
  • Lectures are also incredibly dull.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • You have to work for your grade, but it isn't impossible.
  • He .
  • No matter how much effort you put into your work, it's never enough and it's so unfair.

Theme 3

🗣️ About Participation

  • He requires cameras on, calls you out on everything, is a big group work fan, and is very blunt so it can come off as rude.
  • He really likes it when students participate in discussions and don't be late.
  • If your an because you will be called out frequently in front of the whole class.

Theme 4

❤️ About Support

  • He truly cares for his students, and .
  • If you don't do good on an .
  • He supports students to learn more

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

83

Lifetime ratings

94/100

Evidence confidence

The 50-review sample spans many years, formats, and English courses, with detailed and consistent differences between online and in-person experiences.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 555
4 out of 511
3 out of 53
2 out of 55
1 out of 59

Course coverage

ENG00117 reviews
ENG2517 reviews
ENGL0026 reviews
ENG015 reviews
ENG13 reviews
Show 8 more courses
ENG12513 reviews
ENG22 reviews
ENG42 reviews
ENGL0011 review
ENGL0181 review
ENGLISH11 review
ENGLISH21 review
ENGLISH2511 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

39 reported outcomes

A range

22

A+ 5 · A 10 · A- 7

B range

13

B+ 3 · B 7 · B- 3

C range

2

C+ 1 · C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Not sure yet 1