AI Rate Professor

Ethnic Studies

Andy Wu

Courses not reported · 5 lifetime ratings

AI rating
48/100
RMP rating
3.0/5
Take again
40%
Difficulty
2.0

The decision

if and want an easy course more than a polished teaching experience.

Best fit · Self Taught ProEasy ClassUnorganized OnlineHarsh Grading ConcernsReading RequiredGroup Work
  • The course is usually easy in terms of content and grades.
  • Online reviews raise , and harsh grading.
  • and describe him as caring, engaging, and manageable.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

82/100

Grades are generally easy because reported grades are strong and , but .

and , while online evidence includes harsh grading complaints despite high grades.

Is the course easy?

Introductory

85/100

Students repeatedly describe the class as easy, skippable, easy to follow, and .

Both formats sound academically easy, but online students found the organization much harder to deal with.

Is attendance flexible?

Optional

88/100

, and an online review says the class was easy to skip.

Online evidence suggests low attendance pressure, while .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

42/100

Recommendation depends heavily on format because in-person students are positive while online students warn about poor organization and grading.

Online reviews are mostly negative, while .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

35/100

Even with good grades, multiple online reviews call him a tough or .

Format shift

and manageable tests, while online reviews repeatedly criticize harsh grading.

Workload

Light

76/100

The course appears light, with textbook quizzes, discussions, group work, and few signs of heavy workload.

Format shift

Online evidence mentions textbook quizzes and group participation, while , and easy quizzes.

Teaching experience

Average

55/100

He can be caring and engaging in person, but online students describe him as , and sloppy.

Format shift

In-person teaching evidence is positive, while online teaching evidence is substantially weaker.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Assessments include quizzes, reading, discussions, group work, tests, and .

Format shift

Online reviews mention textbook quizzes, assignments, group work, and tests, while , and group projects.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are positive and describe a , and optional attendance.

Main concern

He can talk excessively and expects respectful participation.

What students said

“Caring and engaging professor.”
28568
“ , and the class is easy to follow.”
28568

Remote format

Online

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are mixed to negative, with students calling the class easy but , and unfairly graded.

Main concern

and late communication hurt the online experience.

What students said

“ and unhelpful.”
81210
“He grades harshly even when given little to no directions.”
81210

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention textbook-based quizzes and chapter-based tests but do not clearly prove proctoring, open-book rules, webcam use, or .

Textbook QuizzesTests Based On ChaptersReviews do not clearly prove proctoring

Assessment risk

Standard

62/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, but do not clearly prove closed-book rules or final format.

Tests Based On ChaptersQuizzes Not Particularly Challenging
“For and I was good!”
28568
“ .”
28568

Online

Online reviews mention textbook quizzes and tests but do not clearly prove .

Textbook QuizzesTest Heavy tagReviews do not clearly prove online proctoring
“ .”
28568

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If you have the .”

Voice snapshots generated from 5 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

55/100

“Caring and engaging professor.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

42/100

“ .”

⚖️

35/100

“He grades harshly even when given little to no directions.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Honestly, it was a bit boring.
  • Caring and engaging professor.
  • and unhelpful.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • The class is easy to follow.
  • .
  • He would still grade unfairly upon rubrics that weren't even specified.

Theme 3

🧩 About Structure

  • The and lacked any specific directions.
  • A announcements late into the night.
  • , and the class is easy to follow.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

5

Recent reviews read by the AI

5

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is medium because there are only 5 reviews, but they are recent and show a .

Inside 5 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 52
3 out of 51
2 out of 52
1 out of 50

Course coverage

285683 reviews
812102 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

5 reported outcomes

A range

3

A 3

B range

2

B+ 1 · B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values