AI Rate Professor

Consumer Family Studies

Raul Angeles

CD159 · CD158 · CHLD158 · CD126 · CHILD126 · CD154 · 11 lifetime ratings

AI rating
90/100
RMP rating
4.1/5
Take again
81.82%
Difficulty
2.5

The decision

He is a good choice for students who want a supportive instructor and can tolerate lecture-heavy classes.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyCaring professorClear instructionsEasy gradingLecture heavyAccessible outside class
  • Students commonly describe him as caring, helpful, and accessible outside class.
  • Grades are generally attainable because , and instructions are often clear.
  • The biggest complaint is repetitive or long PowerPoint lectures, with .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

82/100

An A is realistic because students , and straightforward tests, but studying and attendance can still matter.

In-person reviews provide the main grade evidence, while the single online review is positive but .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

72/100

The and instructions, though lecture repetition and test-heavy sections add friction.

concerns, while the online review mainly supports a welcoming classroom experience.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

45/100

One , while and participation do not matter much.

and is conflicting; the online review does not clearly define attendance rules.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

84/100

, and accessible, despite lecture and test complaints.

Both formats are positive, but online confidence is limited to one review while and more mixed.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

78/100

Students describe easy grading and manageable tests, though .

Format shift

, while the single online review does not clearly address grading.

Workload

Light

80/100

Homework is described as very little, with tests, PowerPoints, and a work.

Format shift

, while the online review does not give enough workload detail.

Teaching experience

Good

82/100

He is widely seen as caring, helpful, and clear, but some students say lectures are repetitive or boring.

Format shift

Online evidence is very positive, while in-person evidence is mostly positive with clearer lecture-quality complaints.

Assessment method

Balanced

62/100

Assessment , and lecture material, with tests mentioned often.

Format shift

and projects most clearly, while the online review does not describe assessment structure.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

10 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

and easy grading, but several note long or repetitive lectures and test-heavy structure.

Main concern

Lectures can be repetitive or boring, and .

What students said

“ and .”
CHILD126
“He cares a lot about his students and .”
CD158
“talks in circles every week it is basically the same lecture with minimal change.”
CD158

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

The single online review is very positive and describes an engaging, welcoming, and helpful class.

Main concern

Only , so format-specific confidence is limited.

What students said

“He engages with everyone in the class and makes you feel welcomed.”
CHLD158
“Mr. and understanding”
CHLD158

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews support regular tests based on textbook or PowerPoints, but do .

Tests every two weeksPowerPoint-based testsTextbook-based testsExam policy partly unclear

Assessment risk

Standard

58/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

on textbook or PowerPoints, but exam rules are not fully specified.

Tests Every Two WeeksPowerPoint-Based TestsTest Heavy
“The and are based on the textbook, super easy.”
CHILD126
“whatever is on the powerpoint is on the test.”
CHILD126
“Some of the things that were on the .”
CD159

Online

The single online review does not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, open-book, quiz, midterm, or .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ and .”

Voice snapshots generated from 11 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

82/100

“He answered emails very quickly and explained the subject very well.”

📈 Grade Ease

82/100

“ and .”

⚠️ Lecture Concern

58/100

“talks in circles every week it is basically the same lecture with minimal change.”

Theme 1

❤️ About Support And Character

  • He cares a lot about his students and .
  • and caring.
  • Mr. and understanding

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty And Grades

  • and .
  • The and are based on the textbook, super easy.
  • do the and you will pass.

Theme 3

🧾 About Lectures And Tests

  • he lectures through powerpoints and whatever is on the powerpoint is on the test.
  • and lacked in ways I feel were missed information I really needed.
  • talks in circles every week it is basically the same lecture with minimal change.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

11

Recent reviews read by the AI

11

Lifetime ratings

84/100

Evidence confidence

Eleven reviews across several years give detailed and mostly consistent evidence, though only one review is online.

Inside 11 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 56
4 out of 51
3 out of 53
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

CHILD1263 reviews
CD1582 reviews
CD1592 reviews
CHLD1582 reviews
CD1261 review
Show 1 more courses
CD1541 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

11 reported outcomes

A range

6

A+ 1 · A 3 · A- 2

B range

4

B 4

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1