AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Tracy Redden

MATH · MATH200 · STATS21 · MATHMATH · MATH066 · MATH080 · MATH081 · MATH230 · MATH065 · MATH365 · MATH70 · MATH070 · MATH360 · MATH154 · MATH2050 · MATH21 · 52 lifetime ratings

AI rating
45/100
RMP rating
3.1/5
Take again
57.14%
Difficulty
3.1

The decision

if you are comfortable self-studying math, keeping up with homework, and .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerFast PacedLots of HomeworkTest HeavyMixed Teaching QualityPractice Exams Help
  • Reviews are deeply split, with some students praising structure and and frequent mistakes.
  • The course often requires lots of , and outside study to succeed.
  • Students strong in math tend to do better, while beginners often struggle with pace and explanations.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

52/100

An A is possible with , and practice exams, but many students say the workload and teaching issues raise the effort cost.

In person evidence dominates and shows effort-for-reward outcomes, while the single Online review is negative and gives no easy-A support.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

35/100

The math , and hard for beginners despite useful practice materials.

In person reviews repeatedly describe fast pacing and homework, while the single Online review says lectures are .

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

55/100

, but many students say skipping class makes passing much harder.

In person reviews provide mixed attendance evidence, while Online .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

50/100

Recommendations depend heavily on student math strength because reviews and strongly negative experiences.

In person reviews are polarized, while the single Online review recommends avoiding her.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

50/100

Some students call her fair or say practice tests match exams, but others report tough or .

Format shift

In person reviews provide most grading evidence, while .

Workload

Heavy

28/100

Many reviews mention lots of , and substantial outside study.

Format shift

In person , while the single Online review focuses on lecture clarity.

Teaching experience

Average

50/100

Teaching quality is highly polarized, with clear preparation for some students and .

Format shift

In person reviews are mixed, while the single Online review is strongly negative.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

82/100

Reviews repeatedly mention tests, , and .

Format shift

In , while Online evidence does not specify assessment details.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

49 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews are mixed, with praise for preparation and practice exams but frequent complaints about fast pacing, mistakes, and .

Main concern

Students who need slow, step-by-step math instruction may struggle.

What students said

“The questions on the test.”
MATH081
“There's a lot of homework, but if you actually do it and understand it, you and quizzes.”
MATH070

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The lone online review is strongly negative, saying lectures and handwriting were .

Main concern

Online clarity appears weak based on the single review.

What students said

“Her lectures are all over the place and combined with her bad hand writing you cant fallow her.”
14677

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are frequent or important, but many students say and .

Test HeavyPractice Exams Similar to TestsHomework Prepares for TestsPop Quizzes Mentioned

Assessment risk

Standard

52/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In person reviews support a test-heavy class with , but do not clearly prove open-book, closed-book, proctoring, or .

Test HeavyPractice Exams Similar to TestsHomework Prepares for TestsPop Quizzes Mentioned
“The course is test heavy”
MATH080
“The questions on the test.”
MATH081
“BEWARE OF POP QUIZZES”
MATH154

Online

The single Online review does not clearly prove exam format, proctoring, Lockdown .

Exam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“I would only recommend this instructor to students who are strong in math.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and student fit. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

50/100

“Frequent mistakes in her work and .”

📚 Workload

28/100

“There's a lot of homework, but if you actually do it and understand it, you and quizzes.”

🧪

52/100

“The exams so I felt prepared.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She makes math as easy as possible for her students.
  • Her lectures start and end randomly throughout the class.
  • She teaches at a quick pace but if you stay on top of .
  • Frequent mistakes in her work and .

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • The questions on the test.
  • There's a lot of homework, but if you actually do it and understand it, you and quizzes.
  • , but as long as you show your work and she can see how you made a mistake, you won't lose as .

Theme 3

⚠️ About Fit

  • I would only recommend this instructor to students who are strong in math.
  • Not good for beginners or gappers.
  • Be prepared to teach yourself and make sure you have time to go to SI/tutoring sessions.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

52

Lifetime ratings

90/100

Evidence confidence

Fifty reviews span many years and courses, with enough detail to show a reliable but polarized pattern.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 519
4 out of 57
3 out of 53
2 out of 510
1 out of 513

Course coverage

MATH15410 reviews
MATH215 reviews
MATH2305 reviews
MATH0654 reviews
MATH704 reviews
Show 14 more courses
MATH0663 reviews
MATH0703 reviews
MATH0803 reviews
MATH0813 reviews
103871 review
104931 review
146771 review
MATH1 review
MATH2001 review
MATH20501 review
MATH3601 review
MATH3651 review
MATHMATH1 review
STATS211 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

24 reported outcomes

A range

9

A+ 3 · A 6

B range

5

B+ 1 · B 4

C range

4

C+ 1 · C 3

D range

2

D+ 2

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

4

Audit/No Grade 1 · Drop/Withdrawal 2 · Rather not say 1