AI Rate Professor

English

Gilliann Hensley

ENG002 · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
25/100
RMP rating
2.8/5
Take again
25%
Difficulty
4.5

The decision

Take this professor only if , and a potentially tense classroom experience.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerHeavy ReadingLate GradingTough GradingPop QuizzesParticipation Matters
  • Students consistently describe ENG002 as reading-heavy and difficult.
  • , and .
  • Student experiences are mixed, with one severe negative report and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

Getting an A appears hard because , and tough or late grading.

All evidence comes from in-person ENG002 reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

30/100

The course content is challenging mainly because reading and writing are central and students repeatedly warn not to slack off.

All course .

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

45/100

Attendance seems useful because participation matters and students need to ask questions, but .

, and no online evidence exists.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

28/100

Most students do not recommend the class because of , and one report of hostile treatment.

Recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

25/100

as tough, late, and tied heavily to writing projects.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

22/100

The workload is heavy because students repeatedly , and pop quizzes.

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Poor

35/100

Teaching feedback is mixed but leans , and one severe classroom conflict.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

Assessment appears , and pop quizzes rather than major exams.

Format shift

All assessment evidence is from in-person ENG002 reviews.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews describe a demanding English course with , and mixed views on the instructor.

Main concern

The main concern is heavy reading combined with late or .

What students said

“Get ready to read”
ENG002
“Grades late.”
ENG002
“ so dont slack off.”
ENG002

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention pop quizzes and writing projects but do not clearly prove a .

Pop QuizzesWriting ProjectsReviews Do Not Clearly Prove Exam Policy

Assessment risk

Varies

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, but they do not clearly prove midterm, final, proctoring, or open-book policies.

Pop QuizzesExam Policy Not Clearly Proven
“Beware of pop quizzes”
ENG002
“ so dont slack off.”
ENG002

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ so dont slack off.”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, workload, and grading. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

35/100

“Grades late. and chill but you have to ask questions if you dont understand something.”

📚 Workload Pressure

22/100

“ so dont slack off.”

⚖️

25/100

“ . Ask questions!”

Theme 1

📚 About Workload

  • Get ready to read
  • so dont slack off.
  • grade.

Theme 2

⚖️

  • Grades late.
  • . Ask questions!

Theme 3

👨‍🏫 About Classroom Experience

  • and chill but you have to ask questions if you dont understand something.
  • I was verbally attacked and humiliated multiple times by this professor.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

58/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is medium because there are only four reviews, but they and .

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 51
3 out of 52
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

ENG0024 reviews

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

1

B- 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values