AI Rate Professor

English

Jodi Baker

ENG001 · ENG251 · 8 lifetime ratings

AI rating
8/100
RMP rating
1.6/5
Take again
11.11%
Difficulty
4.5

The decision

Avoid this professor unless , and handle strict grading with heavy writing work.

Best fit · Self Taught ProTough GraderLate GradingDisorganizedSo Many PapersUnresponsive
  • Most students describe Baker as , and slow to grade or respond.
  • The workload is heavy, with , and tight deadlines.
  • One and , but it is outweighed by many recent negative reviews.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

14/100

Getting an A appears very difficult because students report , and mostly low grades despite one A.

Both formats are negative, with and and poor feedback.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

24/100

The course feels difficult because lessons are rushed or unclear, students self-teach, and and critical thinking.

Online evidence is too brief for content difficulty, while and demanding writing work.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

15/100

because reviews mention participation, canceled classes, strict due dates, and little deadline flexibility.

In-person reviews drive this score, while the online .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

12/100

Students generally do not recommend Baker because of disorganization, delayed , and strict treatment.

Both formats support avoidance, with and more detailed evidence.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

12/100

because students repeatedly , and no deadline flexibility.

Format shift

Online and , but in-person reviews provide the broader pattern.

Workload

Overwhelming

15/100

Workload is overwhelming because students mention , and rushed timing.

Format shift

The heavy workload evidence comes mainly from in-person reviews, with no detailed online workload evidence.

Teaching experience

Awful

18/100

Teaching quality is awful overall because reviews describe poor structure, unclear expectations, canceled classes, slow responses, and little help.

Format shift

The online review says she is not helpful, while and inconsistent teaching.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

20/100

Assessment appears assignment-heavy, centered on papers, essays, worksheets, research, participation, and .

Format shift

, while online evidence does not explain assessment method.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

8 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews mostly report disorganization, unclear teaching, delayed grading, poor communication, and .

Main concern

The main concern is needing to self-teach while and .

What students said

“She always cancels class and doesn't teach anything.”
ENG001
“Baker would leave so .”
ENG001
“does not answer emails, does not extend deadlines under any circumstances”
ENG251

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The only online review says the professor is not helpful and grades unfairly or late.

Main concern

The main online concern is unfair or .

What students said

“ .”
ENG001

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention quizzes, essays, and papers, but they do not clearly prove the .

Quiz MentionedPapers And EssaysReviews Do Not Clearly Prove Exam Policy

Assessment risk

Varies

40/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and many papers, but they do not clearly prove exam format, proctoring, open-book status, midterm format, or .

Quiz MentionedPapers And EssaysExam Policy Not Clearly Proven
“She refused to let me retake a me physically sick.”
ENG251
“We had 3 essays and the first two we were working on around the same time.”
ENG001

Online

The online review does not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, .

Exam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She always cancels class and doesn't teach anything.”

Voice snapshots generated from 9 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and responsiveness. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

18/100

“The professor lacked structure and consistency.”

⚖️

12/100

“ .”

📚 Workload Pressure

15/100

“She was rude and gave so many assignments.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Lessons jumped around, making everything feel rushed and .
  • She always cancels class and doesn't teach anything.
  • Students teach themselves due to how much she is gone

Theme 2

⚖️ And Feedback

  • .
  • Waits to grade until the final so you are unaware of what your grade is.
  • Baker would leave so .

Theme 3

📚 About Workload And Deadlines

  • She was rude and gave so many assignments.
  • We had 3 essays and the first two we were working on around the same time.
  • does not extend deadlines under any circumstances

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

9

Recent reviews read by the AI

8

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is high because nine reviews include detailed, consistent complaints across recent years, with one older positive outlier.

Inside 9 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 57

Course coverage

ENG0016 reviews
ENG2513 reviews

Reported outcomes

D range results lead the reported letter grades.

8 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

2

B 2

C range

1

C 1

D range

3

D+ 2 · D- 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1