AI Rate Professor

Physical Education

Kenny Jackson

HW007 · HW7 · PEAC074 · HW001 · HW30012 · PEAC14262 · 12 lifetime ratings

AI rating
86/100
RMP rating
3.9/5
Take again
75%
Difficulty
2.5

The decision

if you want a generally easy, motivating class and can tolerate occasional communication issues.

Best fit · Effort For RewardFunnyMotivatingLow WorkloadSometimes UnorganizedAttendance Matters
  • Most students recommend him because he is funny, motivating, and makes class enjoyable.
  • Grades are usually attainable with effort, but a few students report poor communication and organization.
  • In-person reviews mention low outside homework, while the and untimed quizzes.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

82/100

Most students report A-level outcomes with straightforward work, low homework, retakes, or reasonable effort.

Online evidence is and untimed quizzes, while in-person evidence is still easy but depends more on attendance and effort.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

72/100

The course is repeatedly described as straightforward, though some PE sections require active effort and participation.

Online work is described as very straightforward, while but and engagement.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

30/100

Several in-person tags say skipping class hurts performance, even though .

; the single online review does not discuss attendance.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

78/100

, and manageable work, but a few warn about organization and communication.

Both formats are positive, but single online review.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

76/100

Grades are usually attainable, with comments citing easy A , and few major graded items.

Format shift

and untimed quizzes, while in-person grading is generally fair to lenient.

Workload

Light

82/100

Students often say there is and much work is completed during class.

Format shift

Online work is straightforward, and .

Teaching experience

Good

76/100

He is often funny, motivating, and caring, but some students report poor communication and disorganization.

Format shift

Online evidence is positive but limited, while and more mixed.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

30/100

Reviews emphasize assignments, class participation, papers, and quizzes more than traditional exams.

Format shift

Online reviews mention assignments and quizzes, while , and a .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

11 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are mostly positive, emphasizing humor, motivation, low workload, and manageable grades.

Main concern

Some students report , and .

What students said

“Most of the work was done in class during class time so .”
HW001
“He does not even reply to outlook email, you'd have to .”
HW001
“should be an easy A”
HW001

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter

The online review is positive and and untimed quizzes.

Main concern

Only one online review exists, so online confidence is limited.

What students said

“The work was very straight forward and as long as you put good effort toward the .”
HW30012
“ and .”
HW30012

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

The , and writing-based major assessments rather than strict exams.

Untimed QuizzesRetakesFinal EssayMidterm Paper

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

82/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and final essay but do not clearly prove proctoring or .

Midterm PaperFinal EssayReviews Do Not Clearly Prove Proctoring Policy
“He just grades the and final.”
HW001
“ and it's a summary of everything you personally learned in class.”
HW001

Online

The online review explicitly says quizzes are untimed and .

Untimed QuizzesRetakes
“ and .”
HW30012

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ and would take his class again.”

Voice snapshots generated from 12 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and communication. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

76/100

“He is funny, inspirational and just overall a fantastic professor.”

📈 Easy Grade Path

82/100

“should be an easy A”

⚠️ Communication Risk

45/100

“He fails to respond to any emails or messages, so good luck if .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • One of !!! !!!
  • He is funny, inspirational and just overall a fantastic professor.
  • Keeps you laughing while working out.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Most of the work was done in class during class time so .
  • The work was very straight forward and as long as you put good effort toward the .
  • should be an easy A

Theme 3

⚠️ About Organization

  • The communication in the class was not good and I should of had an A but got a B even though I did well on everything in the class.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

12

Recent reviews read by the AI

12

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is high because 12 reviews span several years and show consistent themes despite some mixed opinions.

Inside 12 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 55
4 out of 54
3 out of 51
2 out of 51
1 out of 51

Course coverage

HW0015 reviews
HW0072 reviews
PEAC0742 reviews
HW300121 review
HW71 review
Show 1 more courses
PEAC142621 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

8 reported outcomes

A range

5

A+ 2 · A 3

B range

3

B+ 2 · B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values