AI Rate Professor

Information Technology

Brian Unruh

CT25674 · CT262 · CT204 · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
94/100
RMP rating
4.3/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

if you want an engaging instructor who rewards participation and genuine effort.

Best fit · Effort For RewardHelpfulKnowledgeableEngagingParticipation MattersCaring
  • Students consistently describe him as helpful, knowledgeable, and available for questions.
  • His real-world experience and who want practical skills.
  • Participation matters, and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

A grades are common and students say anyone who wants to learn can succeed, but participation and limited graded items mean it is not a free A.

The .

Is the course easy?

Standard

58/100

The courses seem manageable with help and , but they involve skill development and practical construction or technology content.

The .

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

45/100

Participation matters appears repeatedly, so attendance or active presence likely helps even if .

The and does not prove a mandatory policy.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

92/100

Students recommend him because , and invested in student learning.

The recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

62/100

Grades are strong overall, but and few graded items.

Format shift

The .

Workload

Moderate

58/100

The reviews do not describe heavy workload, but participation and skill development require steady engagement.

Format shift

The .

Teaching experience

Good

84/100

Most reviews praise his availability, explanations, humor, practical knowledge, and care for students.

Format shift

The .

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

Reviews mention participation and few graded items but do .

Format shift

The .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

as , and improving as an instructor.

Main concern

Participation matters and .

What students said

“class was never boring and .”
CT204
“His approach is universal and anyone who wants to learn will succeed.”
CT204
“GRADED BY FEW THINGS”
CT262

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove the , or final exam structure.

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

format, quiz format, proctoring rules, open-book policy, or final exam structure.

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“His approach is universal and anyone who wants to learn will succeed.”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

84/100

“ and why they were important.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

92/100

“ .”

⚖️

62/100

“GRADED BY FEW THINGS”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • class was never boring and .
  • Mr. Unruh was informative and knowledgeable.
  • Trying new and different techniques.

Theme 2

📈 About Learning & Grades

  • His approach is universal and anyone who wants to learn will succeed.
  • Definitely he will teach you well and learn a lot from him.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

68/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is medium because but span several years and include limited assessment detail.

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 51
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

CT2042 reviews
CT256741 review
CT2621 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

4 reported outcomes

A range

3

A 2 · A- 1

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values