AI Rate Professor

Science

Chance Spencer

NSCI · ANATOMY · 8 lifetime ratings

AI rating
44/100
RMP rating
3.1/5
Take again
37.5%
Difficulty
2.9

The decision

if you can manage a and learn independently despite delayed grades.

Best fit · Self Taught ProDisorganizedLate GradingLecture HeavyExtra CreditHelpful But Inconsistent
  • Grades can be high because the class has easy labs, , study guides, and .
  • Teaching quality is sharply mixed, with repeated , and slide-reading lectures.
  • , but several warn against taking him.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

84/100

A-level grades look very attainable because students mention , and make-up opportunities.

The .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

66/100

The class is often described as fairly easy, but broad concepts, prior knowledge gaps, and .

The .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews do not clearly .

The evidence comes only from in-person reviews and .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

38/100

Recommendation is low because several students , and weak lectures despite easy grades.

The recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

78/100

High grades, , make-up opportunities, and easy assignments suggest .

Format shift

The .

Workload

Light

75/100

Students , and make-up opportunities, though studying for tests can still matter.

Format shift

The .

Teaching experience

Poor

42/100

Some students find him caring and helpful, but repeated reviews , and months-late grading.

Format shift

The .

Assessment method

Balanced

52/100

Reviews mention labs, homework, study guides, assignments, and tests, with .

Format shift

The .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

8 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

moments but serious issues in organization, grading speed, and lecture quality.

Main concern

Students , and lectures that rely on slides.

What students said

“The and the .”
NSCI
“He was unprepared, unprofessional, late to ”
NSCI
“Never graded until weeks or MONTHS later”
NSCI

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews support study guides and some difficult tests, but do not clearly prove open-book rules, proctoring, webcam use, or closed-book policy.

Study GuidesLong Tests

Assessment risk

Standard

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and difficult or long tests, but do not clearly prove proctoring rules, open-book rules, or closed-book format.

Study GuidesLong Tests
“I found what he put on study guides difficult to study for.”
anatomy
“ and difficult compared to class”
NSCI

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“This class is fairly easy if you can deal with him as a professor.”

Voice snapshots generated from 8 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

42/100

“Every lecture was just him ..”

📈 Easy Grade Potential

84/100

“The and the .”

⚠️ Organization Risk

30/100

“Never graded until weeks or MONTHS later, so you never knew what your current grades were.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He is a good professor overall but needs more experience teaching
  • He was unprepared, unprofessional, late to
  • but needs to improve as a professor.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • The and the .
  • He gives plenty of and the lectures are kind of long at times
  • and difficult compared to class

Theme 3

🧩 About Organization

  • and chaotic.
  • He also does not grade on time.
  • Waited all semester for him to finally put all the grades in

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

8

Recent reviews read by the AI

8

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is high because eight recent in-person reviews , and teaching concerns.

Inside 8 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 50
3 out of 52
2 out of 51
1 out of 52

Course coverage

NSCI7 reviews
anatomy1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

8 reported outcomes

A range

6

A+ 4 · A 2

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

1

C+ 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values