AI Rate Professor

English

R.C. Mangnall

ENG02 · HIST18 · HIST17 · ENG001 · ENGLISH1ONLINE · ENGL002 · ENGL1 · ENG002 · ENGL2 · ENGL001 · 18 lifetime ratings

AI rating
32/100
RMP rating
2.2/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
3.8

The decision

if you want a demanding course and , and tough grading.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTough GraderUnclear ExpectationsHeavy ReadingDemanding but KnowledgeableLow Support
  • Students often , and poor help when they ask questions.
  • A minority say he is demanding but intellectually worthwhile if students want a serious challenge.
  • Online reviews are , and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

Getting an A appears difficult because students , and many hours of work.

Online and comments more focused on unclear assignments and self-correction.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

34/100

The material is not always impossible, but the reading, writing expectations, and .

Online reviews stress confusing course management, while , and class expectations.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

42/100

, though participation and timely work appear important.

Online evidence focuses more on deadlines and workload, while .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

28/100

Most students do not recommend him because the and .

Both formats include warnings, but online reviews are more consistently negative about support and fairness.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

18/100

Students repeatedly call him a hard or and describe low scores even after completing the work.

Format shift

giving especially direct complaints.

Workload

Heavy

30/100

The workload often , and sustained effort.

Format shift

Online reviews emphasize many hours and computer-bound work, while and essay-heavy testing.

Teaching experience

Poor

42/100

Some students value his knowledge and rigor, but , and weak support.

Format shift

Online teaching is criticized for , while in-person teaching is mixed between demanding but valuable and deeply frustrating.

Assessment method

Balanced

58/100

Assessment , and tests rather than relying on one method only.

Format shift

Online evidence mentions assignments and discussions, while and long essays.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

14 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews are mixed but lean negative, with , and hard grading.

Main concern

Students may struggle with subjective expectations and .

What students said

“ as to what he wants.”
ENGL001
“If you are interested in using your brain and a good bit of .”
ENG02
“Testing required you to read everything and memorize it.”
HIST17

Remote format

Online

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

Online students report , and limited support, with one positive review focused on growth.

Main concern

Unclear online expectations and .

What students said

“basically, don't ask for and an .”
ENG001
“This class was not an easy A, but the knowledge I gained was priceless.”
ENGL001
“ ”
ENGLISH1ONLINE

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

and large essays, but they do not clearly prove proctoring, webcam use, Lockdown Browser, or open-book rules.

Heavy ReadingMemorizationLarge Essay ComponentUnclear Exam Policy

Assessment risk

Strict

30/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

essay component, but not proctoring or open-book rules.

Heavy ReadingMemorizationLarge Essay Component
“Testing required you to read everything and memorize it.”
HIST17
“Each test had a HUGE essay component (min 5 pages, more is better) which was half the grade.”
HIST17

Online

Online reviews do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, Lockdown Browser, open-book, midterm, or .

Unclear Exam Policy

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“This class was not an easy A, but the knowledge I gained was priceless.”

Voice snapshots generated from 18 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and student fit. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

42/100

“ as to what he wants.”

⚖️

18/100

“A .”

📚 Workload Reality

30/100

“I had to put in a lot of hours to keep up with assignments.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Mr. Mangnall is a demanding teacher who creates in the mind of students, a .
  • .
  • When you ask him for help, he just makes it more difficult.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • This class was not an easy A, but the knowledge I gained was priceless.
  • It was a challenge to get a good grade but not a really hard challenge.
  • A .

Theme 3

⚠️ About Student Fit

  • If you are interested in using your brain and a good bit of .
  • .
  • .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

18

Recent reviews read by the AI

18

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is high because 18 reviews span many years and show consistent themes despite some mixed positive comments.

Inside 18 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 54
3 out of 52
2 out of 54
1 out of 57

Course coverage

ENGL0013 reviews
ENGL13 reviews
ENG0012 reviews
ENGL0022 reviews
HIST172 reviews
Show 5 more courses
HIST182 reviews
ENG0021 review
ENG021 review
ENGL21 review
ENGLISH1ONLINE1 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

4 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

1

D 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

3

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Not sure yet 1 · Rather_Not_Say 1