AI Rate Professor

Information Technology

Greg Peterson

COMP005 · COMP8 · CSCI005 · 6 lifetime ratings

AI rating
41/100
RMP rating
1.7/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
1.8

The decision

strong instruction or structured learning.

Best fit · Easy A HunterEasy APoor LecturesSelf-Teaching RequiredDisorganizedFree Textbook
  • Students describe the class as easy to pass, sometimes because .
  • Teaching quality is weak, with , and frequent off-track instruction.
  • Students who want real programming instruction may need to rely on the textbook and teach themselves.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

WalkInThePark

94/100

The grade appears very easy because students report full credit on missing work and textbook-based tests.

and , while in-person evidence says assignments received 100% even when not submitted.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

72/100

The course is easy to pass, but beginners may still struggle because , and often require self-teaching.

, while in-person evidence says programming beginners may have difficulty without self-study.

Is attendance flexible?

Optional

82/100

Attendance appears flexible because one online review says the professor was often late or absent and .

Online evidence supports high flexibility, while in-person .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

30/100

Students generally do not recommend him because the class offers .

Both formats criticize teaching quality, though online evidence is limited to one review.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Generous

96/100

Grading appears extremely lenient, with reports of 100% credit even without submitting work.

Format shift

, and online evidence also shows easy textbook-based work.

Workload

Light

84/100

The workload seems light because assignments and tests are textbook-based and .

Format shift

Online work is described as searchable from the textbook, while as loosely assigned and loosely graded.

Teaching experience

Awful

24/100

Students describe long, boring, sidetracked lectures and say meaningful learning often requires the textbook or self-teaching.

Format shift

Online teaching is criticized for absence and delayed grading, while and weak coding instruction.

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

and tests, but both are described as coming heavily from textbook materials.

Format shift

Online evidence mentions homework and tests, while , and occasional exams.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person students report dull, sidetracked lectures and self-teaching, though .

Main concern

Students may not learn much from lectures and may need outside preparation.

What students said

“The in class and they were all given 100% even if you didn't submit it.”
CSCI005
“If you really want to learn Java, be prepared to teach yourself.”
COMP8
“Lectures feel long and unending”
COMP005

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter

The only online review says lectures were boring or , and textbook-based work made the class very easy.

Main concern

The class may be easy but poorly taught and poorly managed.

What students said

“He was either A) late to class or B) not in class.”
CSCI005
“All of and (which is free), so just ctrl-f your way to victory.”
CSCI005

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exam risk is student-friendly because reviews mention textbook-based tests and occasional open note or .

Textbook-Based TestsOpen Note or Book ExamsFree TextbookLow Exam Difficulty

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

88/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

exams and test-bank questions, but no strict proctoring evidence.

Open Note or Book ExamsTest Bank Questions
“ and ”
COMP005
“ .”
COMP8

Online

The and textbook, but does not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, Lockdown Browser, or open-book rules.

Textbook-Based TestsFree Textbook
“All of and (which is free)”
CSCI005

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If you really want to learn Java, be prepared to teach yourself.”

Voice snapshots generated from 6 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and self-teaching needs. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

24/100

“Lectures feel long and unending, he gets sidetracked which makes lectures more difficult and frustrating to follow.”

✅ Easy Grade

94/100

“The in class and they were all given 100% even if you didn't submit it.”

🧪

88/100

“All of and (which is free), so just ctrl-f your way to victory.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Most of the time he read the lectures from a slideshow (that was made by the textbook company)
  • He gets off track a lot
  • The lectures were very long and boring.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • they were all given 100% even if you didn't submit it.
  • All of and (which is free), so just ctrl-f your way to victory.
  • and

Theme 3

🧠 About Learning Value

  • the textbook
  • If you don't have a background in programming, it could be a very difficult course.
  • If you really want to learn Java, be prepared to teach yourself.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

6

Recent reviews read by the AI

6

Lifetime ratings

66/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is medium because only 6 reviews exist, but they are fairly consistent about poor teaching and .

Inside 6 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 52
1 out of 53

Course coverage

COMP0053 reviews
CSCI0052 reviews
COMP81 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

4 reported outcomes

A range

2

A+ 1 · A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Not sure yet 1 · Not_Sure_Yet 1