AI Rate Professor

English

Lisa Mc Harry

ENG01 · ENGL002 · ENG002 · ENGLISH02 · ENGLISH01 · ENGL01 · ENG251 · ENGL001 · 13 lifetime ratings

AI rating
74/100
RMP rating
3.8/5
Take again
76.92%
Difficulty
3.5

The decision

if you want a supportive English professor and and writing deadlines.

Best fit · Effort For RewardCaring and accessibleClear expectationsStrong feedbackReading and papersOnline scheduling issues
  • Students often , and .
  • The course is manageable when students keep up with reading, essays, and deadlines.
  • Online reviews are more mixed because several students report slow replies, random due dates, and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

62/100

An A is realistic if students complete the , and assignments on time, but it is not a free A.

Online evidence stresses deadline discipline, while and .

Is the course easy?

Standard

55/100

The English content is understandable, but the , and writing standards make it a standard college workload.

Online reviews make the course feel harder because pacing is less predictable, while .

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

48/100

Participation and keeping up matter, but the reviews do not clearly prove a .

Online students must check Canvas and email often, while .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

75/100

Most students recommend her because , and and online pacing complaints.

In-person recommendations are stronger, while online recommendations are split by organization issues.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

58/100

Students describe fair grading and , though some call her tough and .

Format shift

as not too hard but sometimes slow, while but can be demanding.

Workload

Moderate

45/100

The workload centers on reading, papers, and regular assignments, with some online students reporting sudden heavy bursts.

Format shift

Online workload is less predictable, while and writing-heavy.

Teaching experience

Good

78/100

Most comments describe her as , and .

Format shift

In-person teaching comments are consistently positive, while but criticize responsiveness and timing.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

, and major assignments rather than exams.

Format shift

Both formats emphasize assignments and .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

7 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person students describe her as , and but fair reading and writing workload.

Main concern

Essays and if students fall behind.

What students said

“ as defined in syllabus.”
ENGL01
“pretty hard to make an A in the class.”
ENGL001

Remote format

Online

6 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online students praise her feedback and accessibility but also , and sudden deadlines.

Main concern

Random due dates and delayed responses can hurt busy or less independent students.

What students said

“ and 4 papers and you will be fine.”
ENG002
“Very hard to work around due dates because they are so random.”
ENGL001

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove a , and and assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove exam formatAssignment-focused course

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, quiz format, midterm format, or final format.

Reviews do not clearly prove in-person exam policy
“Nice she let us improve on one of the .”
ENG002

Online

Online reviews do not clearly prove .

Reviews do not clearly prove online exam policy
“ and 4 papers and you will be fine.”
ENG002

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She is very nice, is pretty clear in what she expects from , and is very understanding of the challenges her students face, and is willing to accomodate for that.”

Voice snapshots generated from 13 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

78/100

“She is very nice, is pretty clear in what she expects from , and is very understanding of the challenges her students face, and is willing to accomodate for that.”

📚 Workload Reality

45/100

“This class is an English class and there is, as expected, a lot of reading and writing.”

⚖️ Grade Effort

62/100

“Overall, she is a great professor and it is totally possible to get an A, as well.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • as defined in syllabus.
  • and .
  • She really cares about her students understand the , and making sure we understand the MLA in text-citation, things like that.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • This is a 4 unit college-level class, you have to do the work and earn your grade.
  • pretty hard to make an A in the class.
  • It was a lot of work/reading, but it was a summer course!

Theme 3

💻 About Online Class

  • This online class requires and canvas often so discipline is necessary.
  • Very hard to work around due dates because they are so random.
  • It took .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

13

Recent reviews read by the AI

13

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

Thirteen reviews across several years give , and format differences.

Inside 13 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 57
4 out of 52
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 53

Course coverage

ENGL0014 reviews
ENG0022 reviews
ENGL012 reviews
ENG011 review
ENG2511 review
Show 3 more courses
ENGL0021 review
ENGLISH011 review
ENGLISH021 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

10 reported outcomes

A range

5

A+ 1 · A 4

B range

5

B+ 2 · B 2 · B- 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values