AI Rate Professor

Information Technology

Donal Howell

AUTO238 · AUTO130 · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
86/100
RMP rating
5.0/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
4.0

The decision

if you want a and are willing to participate actively.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerPassionate teacherCaring and approachableParticipation mattersMakes hard material understandable
  • Students consistently describe Howell as caring, passionate, and willing to help.
  • Participation and showing up on time matter in his classes.
  • The automotive material can be hard, but students say he makes it understandable.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

55/100

Grades are not automatic because participation and timely work matter, even though the teacher is supportive.

; there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

35/100

The automotive content is described as hard, especially engine performance, but .

; there are no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

45/100

Students repeatedly say to show up on time and participate, but .

; there are no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

94/100

Students strongly recommend him because , and makes difficult material understandable.

All ; there are no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

55/100

and support are mentioned, but the mixed grades do .

Format shift

; there are no online reviews.

Workload

Moderate

50/100

Students mention reading, participation, and doing work on time, but do not describe an overwhelming load.

Format shift

All ; there are no online reviews.

Teaching experience

Excellent

95/100

Every review praises his teaching, help, passion, and ability to make hard automotive material understandable.

Format shift

All ; there are no online reviews.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

Reviews mention participation, discussions, reading, and work but .

Format shift

All ; there are no online reviews.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews are highly positive, with students praising his help, passion, and .

Main concern

Students need to participate and keep up with the work.

What students said

“Mr. !”
AUTO238
“show up participate and he makes it easy to learn.”
AUTO130
“He made learning a very hard subject (Engine performance) understandable.”
AUTO238

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Student comments do not clearly prove exam .

Reviews do not clearly prove exam format

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, proctoring, open-book rules, midterms, or finals.

Reviews do not clearly prove exam format

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“He made learning a very hard subject (Engine performance) understandable.”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, participation, and difficulty. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

95/100

“He made learning a very hard subject (Engine performance) understandable.”

👍 Recommendation Strength

94/100

“Mr. !”

📌 Participation Expectations

45/100

“Just show up on time and be ready to participate and ask questions!!!!”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He's super passionate about teaching the next generation about how to work on cars.
  • Great guy down to earth show up participate and he makes it easy to learn.
  • Very great teacher.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Effort

  • He made learning a very hard subject (Engine performance) understandable.
  • Do your datos & work as soon as possible.
  • Be sure to participate in and involvement.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

68/100

Evidence confidence

, but they are detailed and highly consistent across several years.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

AUTO2382 reviews
AUTO1301 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

1

A- 1

B range

1

B 1

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values