AI Rate Professor

Social Science

Christian Anderson

Courses not reported · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
33/100
RMP rating
2.0/5
Take again
33.33%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

Take Anderson only if you can learn independently and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProSelf-Teaching RequiredMixed Teaching MethodsHomework Before InstructionGroup ProjectBeginner Risk
  • Two of three reviews say students must teach themselves from the textbook.
  • , and clear project guidance make the class manageable.
  • The main concern is course sequencing, with assignments and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

54/100

Passing may be manageable if and attend class, but self-teaching and .

because there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

The material seems moderate, but , and instruction makes it harder than it should be.

because there are no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

42/100

One review says showing up helps pass, but reviews do not clearly prove a .

because there are no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

36/100

Recommendation is low because two reviews describe disappointing teaching methods and heavy self-teaching, despite one positive review.

All because there are no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

50/100

, but there is not enough evidence to call grading clearly lenient or harsh.

Format shift

because there are no online reviews.

Workload

Moderate

45/100

before instruction, but the workload is not described as overwhelming across all reviews.

Format shift

All because there are no online reviews.

Teaching experience

Poor

35/100

Most comments criticize the teaching sequence and say students must teach themselves, even though .

Format shift

All because there are no online reviews.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

30/100

, and a group project more than exams.

Format shift

All because there are no online reviews.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

and mixed, but most warn that students may need to teach themselves from the textbook.

Main concern

Assignments may require self-teaching before the professor covers the material.

What students said

“Well that's essentially what you'll do here.”
25
“So basically you teach yourself the content”
25

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention quizzes and assignments but do not clearly prove .

Quiz MentionedHomework Before InstructionGroup Project

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews mention quizzes and homework timing, but do not clearly prove .

Quiz MentionedHomework Before Instruction
“ , but he goes over that chapter after the assignment and .”
25

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“So basically you teach yourself the content, teach yourslelf how to do the homework and , and then he goes over it.”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and self-teaching. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

35/100

“ .”

📚 Workload Timing

45/100

“ , but he goes over that chapter after the assignment and .”

👍 Recommendation Rate

36/100

“Great professor!”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • .
  • makes sure everyone understands what he's teaching.
  • If you want !

Theme 2

📚

  • learning in class for the week
  • very little of what you learned in class is actually applied.
  • So basically you teach yourself the content

Theme 3

🧩 About Course Structure

  • group project 2nd half of the semester.
  • , but he goes over that chapter after the assignment and .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

38/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is low because only 3 in-person reviews are available, though two share the same concern about self-teaching.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 52

Course coverage

253 reviews

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Drop/Withdrawal 1