AI Rate Professor

English

Alisa Ross

ENG002 · ENGLI001 · 8 lifetime ratings

AI rating
55/100
RMP rating
3.4/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
2.8

The decision

Take her if you want a manageable English course, but expect and .

Best fit · Effort For RewardMixed teaching qualitySimple writing tasksTough gradingLimited feedbackGood lectures when engaged
  • Students describe the class as easy in content but inconsistent in teaching value.
  • Several reviews praise lectures, accessibility, and readability, while and .
  • Getting an A is possible, but comments repeatedly mention lost points and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

62/100

The work is often simple, but and rarely receiving full credit keep the A from being automatic.

Online evidence stresses simple essays with strict grading, while and .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

72/100

The course content sounds manageable, with simple essays, films, and readable material rather than complex concepts.

, though in-person reviews include more complaints about repetitive assignments.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

55/100

Participation is mentioned often, but the reviews do not prove a .

Participation appears in both online and in-person tags, but .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

52/100

Recommendations are mixed because some students liked the lectures, while others disliked the and .

The only online review would not take her again, while and clear frustration.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

34/100

Several students say she rarely gives full credit and .

Format shift

review giving the clearest complaint.

Workload

Moderate

58/100

The work seems repetitive and writing-based but not overwhelming for most students.

Format shift

Online work is described as straightforward essays, while , and repetition.

Teaching experience

Average

57/100

Teaching quality is inconsistent, with praise for lectures and accessibility balanced by complaints about awkward classes and .

Format shift

In-person reviews show the widest split, while the online review .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

20/100

Reviews mainly , and participation rather than major exams.

Format shift

Both formats point toward writing assignments and .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

7 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

and complaints about repetition, awkward class atmosphere, and slow grading.

Main concern

Students may not get timely or .

What students said

“Very easy class to take, enjoyed watching films that went with our lectures.”
ENGLI001
“Learned literally nothing in this class.”
ENG002
“Great teacher. ”
ENGLI001

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The but and full credit was rare.

Main concern

and .

What students said

“ and straightforward.”
ENG002
“She also never gave full credit for anything but , but disappointing, because she gave no reasons why.”
ENG002

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention quizzes but do not clearly prove exam format, proctoring, open-book rules, or .

Reviews do not clearly prove exam policyQuizzes mentioned

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, proctoring, open-book rules, midterms, or finals.

Policy not clearly proven

Online

The online review mentions quizzes but does not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, open-book, midterm, or .

Quizzes mentionedPolicy not clearly proven
“She also never gave full credit for anything but quizzes”
ENG002

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“I guess she's not the but still was not enjoyable in the slightest.”

Voice snapshots generated from 8 reviews, highlighting teaching, grading, workload, and format differences. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

57/100

“I used to hate English but I loved the lectures and the reading.”

⚖️

34/100

“She never gave full credit on any of the weekly assignments, it was always 9/10 or less.”

👍 Recommendation Level

52/100

“Great teacher. ”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She a good teacher
  • Learned literally nothing in this class.
  • I used to hate English but I loved the lectures and the reading.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Very easy class to take, enjoyed watching films that went with our lectures.
  • She also never gave full credit for anything but , but disappointing, because she gave no reasons why.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

8

Recent reviews read by the AI

8

Lifetime ratings

68/100

Evidence confidence

Eight reviews across several years give useful but mixed evidence, with only one online review and some very brief comments.

Inside 8 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 52
3 out of 51
2 out of 53
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ENG0024 reviews
ENGLI0014 reviews

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

4 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

3

B+ 2 · B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values