AI Rate Professor

American Sign Language

Ettiene Harvey

ASL001 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
100/100
RMP rating
5.0/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
3.5

The decision

Take this class if you want an and are willing to participate.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyEngaging activitiesFunnyCaringParticipation basedBeginner friendly
  • Students describe Harvey as outstanding, funny, caring, and highly engaging.
  • Participation matters because ASL learning depends on active practice and group activities.
  • Tests are manageable if students study the basic signs.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

72/100

Grades are strong and tests are easy if students actually study, but participation and basic practice are expected.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

74/100

The class feels approachable because games, humor, and group activities make basic ASL practice easier to learn.

Only in-person reviews exist, so there is no format comparison.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

45/100

Participation matters because students need active practice to learn ASL, though .

All attendance evidence comes from in-person comments about participation.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

98/100

Both students strongly recommend him because , and effective.

Recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

76/100

Tests are described as easy with study, and reported grades are high, but effort is still required.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

65/100

The workload appears manageable, centered on studying signs and .

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Excellent

98/100

Students praise his humor, care, engagement, games, and ability to connect with the class.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

, and active practice rather than relying only on exams.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

, group activities, and personal connection.

Main concern

Students need to participate actively to benefit from the class.

What students said

“This is the so far, funny and caring.”
ASL001
“Gets everyone to engage through humor and group activities!”
ASL001

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews say tests are easy if students study basic signs, but they do .

Easy Tests If StudiedBasic Signs

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

82/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, but do not clearly prove open-book, closed-book, proctoring, or .

Easy Tests If StudiedBasic Signs
“ if you actually study your basic signs.”
ASL001

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“By far the and class I have taken!”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, participation, and grading. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

98/100

“Great teacher! Gets everyone to engage through humor and group activities!”

👍 Recommendation Rate

98/100

“By far the and class I have taken!”

📈 Grade Effort

72/100

“ if you actually study your basic signs.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • This is the so far, funny and caring.
  • Great teacher! Gets everyone to engage through humor and group activities!

Theme 2

❤️ About Character

  • He doesnt just teach, he gets to know his students, making a social emotional connection and !
  • Outstanding!

Theme 3

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • if you actually study your basic signs.
  • Participation matters because how else are you going to learn ASL?

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

58/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is medium because the two reviews are detailed and consistent but the sample size is very small.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ASL0012 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

1

A+ 1

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values