AI Rate Professor

History

Savannah Nakamura

HIST18 · HIST16367 · HIST018 · HIST14243 · HIS018 · 11 lifetime ratings

AI rating
82/100
RMP rating
4.1/5
Take again
81.82%
Difficulty
3.4

The decision

if and projects, because her support and grade recovery options usually make the class worthwhile.

Best fit · Effort For RewardCaringTough Project GraderNo TestsRevision FriendlyReading Required
  • Students consistently like her attitude, clarity, reminders, and willingness to help.
  • Online , but projects and writing can be graded strictly.
  • Grade support comes from revisions, dropped grades, , and manageable pacing when students keep up.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

68/100

An A is realistic for organized students because she drops grades and allows revisions, but .

Online evidence shows more grade recovery options, while but gives less detail on grades.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

67/100

The content is generally manageable and sometimes easy, but , and fast pacing add real challenge.

Online reviews describe manageable asynchronous work with projects, while and reading responses.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

70/100

, while in-person comments suggest skipping class is risky.

Online evidence includes asynchronous Zoom not required, while .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

82/100

Most students recommend her because , and gives chances to recover from low grades.

, though online reviews are more mixed because of .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

58/100

She grades projects strictly, but revisions, dropped grades, , and leeway make the .

Format shift

Online reviews repeatedly mention tough project grading and recovery options, while .

Workload

Moderate

62/100

Workload is usually manageable but , and unit projects.

Format shift

Online workload is structured around weekly discussions and projects, while and essays.

Teaching experience

Good

84/100

Students describe her as , and engaging, with only a .

Format shift

Online reviews praise support and reminders, while and learning experience.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

18/100

Reviews describe projects, discussions, essays, and reading responses rather than exams.

Format shift

Online reviews explicitly say no tests, while , and essays.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews strongly praise her lectures and thorough teaching, with reading responses and .

Main concern

Skipping class or .

What students said

“Honestly, just take her class, the .”
HIST018
“If you want and enjoy learning in the process.”
HIST18

Remote format

Online

9 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online reviews describe a , strict grading, and helpful revision or drop policies.

Main concern

Projects and writing can sharply affect grades despite many support options.

What students said

“ so many of your lowest grades, not just one, multiple ones so that helps your grade.”
HIST018
“ , but she gives a good amount of time to work on them.”
HIST18
“Super easy online class with minimal work.”
HIST16367

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

The strongest evidence shows no traditional tests, with , and discussions.

No TestsUnit ProjectsEssaysWeekly Discussions

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

86/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

policy and mainly mention reading responses, source analysis, and essays.

Reading ResponsesPrimary Source AnalysisEssay
“Not really assignment heavy, just reading responses, primary source analysis, and .”
HIST018

Online

Online reviews explicitly describe no tests and project-based assessment, but do not clearly prove .

No TestsUnit ProjectsWeekly DiscussionsShort Essay
“ , but she gives a good amount of time to work on them.”
HIST18
“ , so keep in mind due dates and schedule your time wisely.”
HIST018

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“I love having her as a teacher so much. She is very considerate and knows we struggle and can have bad days and allows some leeway.”

Voice snapshots generated from 11 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

84/100

“ and send out many reminders, you can tell she just wanted to help her students.”

⚖️

58/100

“She's a , but she does offer plenty of /remakes.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

82/100

“Would recommend her class 100%.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Savannah was a really great online professor.
  • I really enjoyed her lectures.
  • Mrs. Nakamura is a Great professor.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • .
  • She lets you re-submit them for a better grade.
  • Even if you work hard, it's tough to get an A in her class.

Theme 3

📝 About Workload

  • There are 2 weekly discussions that are easy to do.
  • The 3 unit projects are a little tough but .
  • This class requires a lot of writing.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

11

Recent reviews read by the AI

11

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

Eleven reviews across online and , projects, and grading.

Inside 11 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 56
4 out of 52
3 out of 52
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

HIST0185 reviews
HIST183 reviews
HIS0181 review
HIST142431 review
HIST163671 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

6 reported outcomes

A range

4

A+ 1 · A 3

B range

1

B 1

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values